2014
DOI: 10.1109/led.2013.2291783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposal for a Novel Hybrid Interconnect Technology for the End of Roadmap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
20
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulations within the Mayadas-Shatzkes model showed that the much shorter MFP of Ru and Ir was indeed responsible for the much weaker thickness dependence of the thin film resistivity. This confirms earlier predictions [27,37,38] and justifies the usage of (λρ 0 ) −1 as a figure of merit of alternative metals for beyond-Cu interconnects [34,36], in particular with respect to the the expected scaling behavior. Indeed, PGMs-and in particular Ruhave recently shown excellent prospects to replace Cu in future nanoscale interconnects with scaled widths of 10 nm and below [41,[75][76][77][78].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simulations within the Mayadas-Shatzkes model showed that the much shorter MFP of Ru and Ir was indeed responsible for the much weaker thickness dependence of the thin film resistivity. This confirms earlier predictions [27,37,38] and justifies the usage of (λρ 0 ) −1 as a figure of merit of alternative metals for beyond-Cu interconnects [34,36], in particular with respect to the the expected scaling behavior. Indeed, PGMs-and in particular Ruhave recently shown excellent prospects to replace Cu in future nanoscale interconnects with scaled widths of 10 nm and below [41,[75][76][77][78].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As discussed above, metals with short MFPs may be less sensitive to surface or grain boundary scattering and thus may show a weaker thickness dependence of the resistivity than Cu [27,37,38]. As indicated in Tab.…”
Section: Group Metalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To cope with such issues, alternative conductive materials with low resistivity and high ampacity are highly required for interconnect applications . Graphene, a two‐dimensional carbon material with a honeycomb lattice, has been proposed as a promising interconnect material in future nanoscale integrated circuits (ICs) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 To cope with such issues, alternative conductive materials with low resistivity and high ampacity are highly required for interconnect applications. [3][4][5][6] Graphene, a two-dimensional carbon material with a honeycomb lattice, has been proposed as a promising interconnect material in future nanoscale integrated circuits (ICs). 7 To reduce large resistance of a monolayer graphene nanoribbon (GNR), multilayer GNR has been demonstrated to be superior to their Cu counterparts for intermediate and global level interconnect applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%