1993
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.5.736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposed classification code for farm and agricultural injuries.

Abstract: A fundamental problem with classifying agriculturally related injury is that there is neither a rational nor a comprehensive scheme for grouping incidents into categories describing actual exposures encountered on farms and in agricultural work. Current surveillance systems are unable to differentiate between work that is related to farm production and work that is not, and to include all exposed persons in the surveillance. The proposed Farm and Agricultural Injury Classification Code is a step toward overcom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the number has been relatively stable for each 2-year period. The 26 articles were published in eight journals, primarily the Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health (12), followed by the Journal of Agromedicine (4) …”
Section: Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the number has been relatively stable for each 2-year period. The 26 articles were published in eight journals, primarily the Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health (12), followed by the Journal of Agromedicine (4) …”
Section: Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible solution to this is to add more accessorial information into the identification code to ensure its uniqueness. Some studies have recommended a category attribute as the preferred supplement on account of its inherency and stability [38,39]. Nonetheless, automatic coding for categories is another problem, and the efficiency and accuracy of category encoding has yet to be confirmed.…”
Section: Limitations and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the small number of women and minorities, our analysis was limited to white, male POs (who accounted for >99% of all POs). Of the 235 injuries, 85 injuries were not related to farm production work (i.e., these injuries were not FAIC-1 1 [Murphy et al, 1993]), 52 injuries pertained to individuals other than the PO, and 10 could not be included for other reasons (e.g., not white males or data were missing). A total of 88 injuries were, therefore, included in our analyses.…”
Section: Selection Of Cases and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%