2020
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.243188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective, Comparative Study of Ventilation–Perfusion Planar Imaging and Ventilation–Perfusion SPECT for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Abstract: The study compared the diagnostic performance of Planar Ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) and V/Q Single-photon computed tomography (SPECT), and determined whether combining perfusion scanning with low-dose computed tomography (Q-LDCT) may be equally effective in a prospective study of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients. Background V/Q scanning is recommended for excluding CTEPH during the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
27
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This opinion is supported by previous studies. 5,16 Abbreviations: NPSPDs, number of pulmonary segments with perfusion defects; PPDs%, the percentage of pulmonary perfusion defect score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This opinion is supported by previous studies. 5,16 Abbreviations: NPSPDs, number of pulmonary segments with perfusion defects; PPDs%, the percentage of pulmonary perfusion defect score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the metric and results of the present work, it needs to be noted that quantitative volumetric data of both ventilation and perfusion scans were not evaluated in any of the referenced studies [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The main image analysis method is a qualitative assessment of the perfusion SPECT and segmental or subsegmental defects, as defined in the clinical guidelines of the EANM [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Johns et al [10] determined a positive or negative diagnosis for CTEPH based on visual interpretation of perfusion SPECT images. Wang et al [15] also classified the images visually as positive or negative for PE, as the clinical guidelines do not differentiate between acute PE and CTEPH. In Renapurkar et al [11], the defects in the perfusion SPECT scan are graded on a four-point scale and only planar V/Q scanning is used for quantitative measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the latest diagnostic algorithm from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [24], patients with intermediate or high probability of PH at echocardiography benefit from radionuclide ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scintigraphy, which accurately detects suggestive abnormalities, typically large mismatched perfusion defects. Sensitivity and specificity are excellent (>90 %) with both planar V/Q, and V/Q single-photon computed tomography (SPECT) [34]. Additionally, due to its nearly perfect negative predictive value, V/Q can safely exclude CTEPH and avoid unnecessary additional diagnostic tests.…”
Section: Cteph Imaging and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%