2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective controlled study of continuous spinal analgesia versus repeat epidural analgesia after accidental dural puncture in labour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
55
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
55
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…After delivery in this patient, the spinal catheter was left in place for 24 hours. However, Russell et al, in a prospective controlled study in 2012, demonstrated no benefi t to leaving an intrathecal catheter in place ( 8 ). Today, we routinely remove spinal catheters shortly after vaginal or cesarean delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After delivery in this patient, the spinal catheter was left in place for 24 hours. However, Russell et al, in a prospective controlled study in 2012, demonstrated no benefi t to leaving an intrathecal catheter in place ( 8 ). Today, we routinely remove spinal catheters shortly after vaginal or cesarean delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, these patients are at increased risk of developing a PDPH. Although keeping intrathecal catheters in situ for 24 hr was thought to reduce the incidence of PDPH 16 , a recent prospectively controlled trial 14 showed no difference in either the incidence of headache or use of blood patch if intrathecal catheters were maintained for 24 hr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18-gauge) reduces the risk or severity of PDPH. 1,4,14,15 Bed rest and hydration are not effective, 16 nor is there sufficient evidence to support any drug therapy, with the possible exception of repeated doses of epidural morphine 17 or a single dose of intravenous cosyntropin (a synthetic adrenocorticotrophic hormone analogue). 18 The latter approaches may not suit the clinical circumstances and it would be unwise to change practice based on the positive findings of a single small www.obstetanesthesia.com randomised trial for each drug.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,19 Bearing-down at delivery may have an impact, but the only randomised trial did not find benefit in avoiding bearing-down in the second stage of labour 20 and this is unappealing because of its major obstetric implications. Rather than repeating an epidural, intrathecal placement of the epidural catheter allows effective analgesia to be established with fewer complications 15 and has become increasingly popular, 21 but strict safety measures need to be implemented; whether this prevents PDPH is contentious. While this approach is strongly supported by some anaesthetists, my personal experience does not correspond at all with the large beneficial effect observed in a non-randomised study; 22 observational studies have been equivocal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation