2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective histomorphometric and cephalometric comparison of bovine bone substitute and autogenous bone grafting in Le Fort I osteotomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bone substitute materials (BSMs) of a xenogeneic, an allogeneic and an alloplastic origin are well established and widely used as suitable alternatives in numerous fields of medicine [4][5][6][7]. In the range of craniomaxillofacial regeneration, BSMs can cover a wide variety of clinical indications such as alveolar ridge preservation and augmentation, sinus floor elevation and the bony reconstruction of congenital or acquired maxillofacial malformations and defects [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone substitute materials (BSMs) of a xenogeneic, an allogeneic and an alloplastic origin are well established and widely used as suitable alternatives in numerous fields of medicine [4][5][6][7]. In the range of craniomaxillofacial regeneration, BSMs can cover a wide variety of clinical indications such as alveolar ridge preservation and augmentation, sinus floor elevation and the bony reconstruction of congenital or acquired maxillofacial malformations and defects [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of allogeneic and xenogenic bone grafting materials can also be used, where the former performs the role of an osteoinductive agent and the latter performs a mechanical role [90]. The category of xenogenic bone grafts should be noted separately: bovine bone material is often used for their production [91][92][93]. There are data confirming high osteoconductive properties of xenogenic bovine bone material [94], while the independent use of xenogenic bone grafting material, despite the positive postoperative outcome in individual cases [95], demonstrates poor quality of clinical outcome [96,97].…”
Section: Native Substitutes For Autologous Bone Grafting Material: Al...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autogenous bone grafting has become the criterion standard therapy for bone defects [ 5 ]. However, the clinical application of autogenous bone grafting is limited by the shortage of donors and by complications such as infection, pain, nerve injury, and the potential for new fractures [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%