1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb02388.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective longitudinal study of social, psychological and obstetric factors in pregnancy: response rates and demographic characteristics of the 8556 respondents

Abstract: Summary This paper introduces the Mater Misericordiae Mothers' Hospital‐University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy, a prospective study of 8556 pregnant women interviewed at their first clinic visit, and subsequently interviewed some days after the birth of the baby and again 6 months later. Additional data were derived from the medical record of the pregnancy and delivery. The study was designed to assess the impact of social, psychological and obstetric factors on pregnancy outcome. We present here details … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
251
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
251
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a weak but significant ssociation of maternal drinking before pregnancy, which may reflect residual confounding from other aternal or parental factors which we were not able to measure in this study (Merikangas et al, 1998b). We lso found associations of maternal drinking before and after pregnancy with child's greater consumption of lcohol in adolescence, a marker of environmental and/or modelling influences during child development, hich are known to contribute to later alcohol problems ([Lieb et al, 2002] and [Merikangas et al, 1998a]). ur main objective was to assess a potential association between maternal drinking in pregnancy and dolescent patterns of alcohol use.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found a weak but significant ssociation of maternal drinking before pregnancy, which may reflect residual confounding from other aternal or parental factors which we were not able to measure in this study (Merikangas et al, 1998b). We lso found associations of maternal drinking before and after pregnancy with child's greater consumption of lcohol in adolescence, a marker of environmental and/or modelling influences during child development, hich are known to contribute to later alcohol problems ([Lieb et al, 2002] and [Merikangas et al, 1998a]). ur main objective was to assess a potential association between maternal drinking in pregnancy and dolescent patterns of alcohol use.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is a pre-birth prospective cohort study which examines the impact of social, psychological and obstetric factors on pregnancy outcomes. Further details on the study design, sampling, response rates and demographic characteristics of the overall sample are presented in greater detail elsewhere ( [Keeping et al, 1989] and [Najman et al, 2005]). In brief, 7223 consecutive women were interviewed in hospital at their antenatal visit (about 18 weeks into gestation).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Full details of the MUSP study are described elsewhere. 17 Mothers and children have been followed-up prospectively with maternal questionnaires being administered when they were at their first antenatal clinic visit, 3-5 days postdelivery, 6 months after birth, 5 and 14 y after birth. In addition, at ages 5 and 14 y, detailed physical, cognitive and developmental examinations of the children were undertaken, and at 14 y, the children completed health, welfare and lifestyle questionnaires.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A portable stadiometer was used to measure the height. Overweight or obesity was defined according to standard definitions derived from international surveys by Cole et al 18 Thus using the standard definition, in this study, a 5-y-old child was defined as overweight or obese if a child's BMI was greater than 17 18 Too few of the participants fell into the obese categories for meaningful analyses; therefore, we classified children as either overweight or obese (equal to or above the overweight threshold) or normal weight (below the overweight threshold).…”
Section: Measurement Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%