A prospective multicentre study testing the diagnostic accuracy of an automated cough sound centred analytic system for the identification of common respiratory disorders in children

Abstract

Background The differential diagnosis of paediatric respiratory conditions is difficult and suboptimal. Existing diagnostic algorithms are associated with significant error rates, resulting in misdiagnoses, inappropriate use of antibiotics and unacceptable morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in acoustic engineering and artificial intelligence have shown promise in the identification of respiratory conditions based on sound analysis, reducing dependence on diagnostic support services and clinical expertise. We present the results of a diagnostic accuracy study for paediatric respiratory disease using an automated cough-sound analyser. Methods We recorded cough sounds in typical clinical environments and the first five coughs were used in analyses. Analyses were performed using cough data and up to five-symptom input derived from patient/parent-reported history. Comparison was made between the automated cough analyser diagnoses and consensus clinical diagnoses reached by a panel of paediatricians after review of hospital charts and all available investigations. Results A total of 585 subjects aged 29 days to 12 years were included for analysis. The Positive Percent and Negative Percent Agreement values between the automated analyser and the clinical reference were as follows: asthma (97, 91%); pneumonia (87, 85%); lower respiratory tract disease (83, 82%); croup (85, 82%); bronchiolitis (84, 81%). Conclusion: The results indicate that this technology has a role as a high-level diagnostic aid in the assessment of common childhood respiratory disorders. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (retrospective) - ACTRN12618001521213 : 11.09.2018.

Readiness for voice assistants to support healthcare delivery during a health crisis and pandemic

“…VA could assist the nurse triaging by assessing the risk level of the patients through conversational assessment, as proposed with chatbots 47 . In a broader scale, VA could also utilize voice as a digital biomarker, which could be leveraged for the continuous screening and detection of pandemic symptoms, such as identifying respiratory disorders 48,49 .…”

Sounds of sickness: can people identify infectious disease using sounds of coughs and sneezes?

“…If so, the necessary sound variation would not have been available to natural selection processes (or perceivers). Such sound variation could be very limited, but recent work suggests that this variation is available (e.g., to statistical learning algorithms; Porter et al, 2019). However, human hearing mechanisms may not be able to use it reliably, even with clinical training (e.g., Smith, Ashurst, Jack, Woodcock, & Earis, 2006).…”

Machine learning to assist clinical decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…A model could predict the probability of a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and its severity by taking answers from symptomatic individuals and amplifying it with clinical information from electronic health records (EHRs), including comorbidities (DeCaprio et al 2020), complaints, and demographics (including geography). An ML model could even predict levels of dyspnea over the phone with estimations of emotional affect and cough sounds from speech already possible (Fayek et al 2017;Porter et al 2019). The severity prediction could also indicate the level of necessary care: self-monitoring, outpatient doctor visit, or ED visit (Greenhalgh et al 2020).…”