2021
DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective, observational study to evaluate adverse drug reactions in patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir or hydroxychloroquine: a preliminary report

Abstract: Objectives Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the pressure to minimise its impact on public health has led to the implementation of different therapeutic strategies, the efficacy of which for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was unknown at the time. Remdesivir (REM) was granted its first conditional marketing authorisation in the EU in June 2020. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and local health authorities all across the EU have since str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, four studies [ 24 , 26 , 27 , 38 ] had a possible bias of deviation from the intended intervention, and five [ 29 , 39–42 ] presented some concerns regarding the bias of missing outcomes. For the nine NRSIs, six studies [ 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 37 , 43 ] showed a critical bias, three [ 32 , 33 , 36 ] showed moderate bias due to confounding, and four studies [ 31 , 34 , 35 , 37 ] showed moderate bias due to the selection of participants. In addition, three [ 31 , 32 , 36 ] showed critical bias, and three [ 32 , 34 , 43 ] showed moderate bias due to the measurement of outcomes, and one [ 43 ] showed moderate bias due to the selection of the reported result.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, four studies [ 24 , 26 , 27 , 38 ] had a possible bias of deviation from the intended intervention, and five [ 29 , 39–42 ] presented some concerns regarding the bias of missing outcomes. For the nine NRSIs, six studies [ 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 37 , 43 ] showed a critical bias, three [ 32 , 33 , 36 ] showed moderate bias due to confounding, and four studies [ 31 , 34 , 35 , 37 ] showed moderate bias due to the selection of participants. In addition, three [ 31 , 32 , 36 ] showed critical bias, and three [ 32 , 34 , 43 ] showed moderate bias due to the measurement of outcomes, and one [ 43 ] showed moderate bias due to the selection of the reported result.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of ADR was significantly higher (47.5%) in hydroxychloroquine (as the comparison group in this study) than in RDV (12.5%) (P<0.001). 18 A study conducted in Spain with 123 subjects stated that RDV was used in four subjects with chronic kidney disease and 24 subjects with reduced immunity (13 with solid neoplasms, 8 with hematological disease and 3 with HIV infection).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,25] The data showed no potential benefits of these drugs for the treatment of COVID-19, and long-term and high-dose of these drugs can cause serious cardiac adverse events. [26,27] Finally, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are not approved via the FDA for the treatment of COVID-19. A variety of therapeutic approaches including novel antivirals, modifiers of the immune response or other intrinsic pathways, and combination approach are needed to continue to improve outcomes in patients with COVID-19.…”
Section: Laboratory Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%