2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective randomized trial comparing hypofractionation with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for T1–2 glottic squamous cell carcinomas: Results of a Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG-0201) study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
67
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prospective randomized trial of the Korean Radiation Oncology group (KROG-0201 study), comparing hypofractionated (63 Gy/28 fractions) with conventional radiation schedules (66 Gy/33 fractions), showed no significant differences in LC-rates and toxicity between both arms. The 5-year LC-rates for patients with T1a disease trend positively in the hypofractionated, compared to the conventional arm (93% vs. 76.7%, p=0.056) (15).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prospective randomized trial of the Korean Radiation Oncology group (KROG-0201 study), comparing hypofractionated (63 Gy/28 fractions) with conventional radiation schedules (66 Gy/33 fractions), showed no significant differences in LC-rates and toxicity between both arms. The 5-year LC-rates for patients with T1a disease trend positively in the hypofractionated, compared to the conventional arm (93% vs. 76.7%, p=0.056) (15).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although many radiation oncologists are concerned that using large fraction sizes may lead to an increase in late toxicity, different studies have shown that hypofractionated schemes of radiotherapy for early stage glottic cancer have resulted in comparable LC rates and toxicity profiles, compared to conventional schemes (14,15). The prospective randomized trial of the Korean Radiation Oncology group (KROG-0201 study), comparing hypofractionated (63 Gy/28 fractions) with conventional radiation schedules (66 Gy/33 fractions), showed no significant differences in LC-rates and toxicity between both arms.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,18,[22][23][24][25] In some reports these indicators reach 100%. 2,13,26 The publications on hypofractionated accelerated RT for larynx cancer present results in T1-T2 tumors while in our study T3 tumors were diagnosed in 8% of patients in the H group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Two papers report results of randomized trials. 13,23 Due to differences in methodology, endpoints and follow-up duration the comparison of results is of a limited value. No difference in toxicity between standard and hypofractionated protocols was found in published reports of hypofractionated RT of the laryngeal cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation