2018
DOI: 10.5350/dajpn2018310401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A psychological and social perspective on completed suicides in Western Anatolia, Turkey: a case-control psychological autopsy study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 While it is stated in the studies that the reason for suicide is mostly unknown, it is not entered into details and is not included in the statistical analysis, while in the studies of Oğuzhanoğlu et al and Karataş et al it is stated that the relatives of the victims do not want to explain the real reason/reasons of suicide due to the effect of stigma and taboos. 36 , 37 In the study conducted by Demir in Bursa, it was reported that no data on the cause of suicide could be reached. 38 From this, it is understood that the attitudes and behaviors of the researchers, as well as the attitudes of the victims” relatives, may vary according to the geographical region and provinces where the study was conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 While it is stated in the studies that the reason for suicide is mostly unknown, it is not entered into details and is not included in the statistical analysis, while in the studies of Oğuzhanoğlu et al and Karataş et al it is stated that the relatives of the victims do not want to explain the real reason/reasons of suicide due to the effect of stigma and taboos. 36 , 37 In the study conducted by Demir in Bursa, it was reported that no data on the cause of suicide could be reached. 38 From this, it is understood that the attitudes and behaviors of the researchers, as well as the attitudes of the victims” relatives, may vary according to the geographical region and provinces where the study was conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] while it is stated that there is no unknown cause, it is estimated that the reason for suicide is unknown in the study of Mete et al in the province of Bingöl of 99 cases (18% of all cases), 30 in the study of Şimşek et al in the province of Manisa of 615 cases (9%), 31 in the study of Goceoglu and Balci in Muğla province of 42 (24%), 32 Bork et al of 89 cases (24.4%) in Elazig province, 33 35 While it is stated in the studies that the reason for suicide is mostly unknown, it is not entered into details and is not included in the statistical analysis, while in the studies of Oğuzhanoğlu et al and Karataş et al it is stated that the relatives of the victims do not want to explain the real reason/reasons of suicide due to the effect of stigma and taboos. 36,37 In the study conducted by Demir in Bursa, it was reported that no data on the cause of suicide could be reached. 38 From this, it is understood that the attitudes and behaviors of the researchers, as well as the attitudes of the victims" relatives, may vary according to the geographical region and provinces where the study was conducted.…”
Section: Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the optimised psychological autopsy method utilizes two comparison groups (matched GP controls and high-risk self-harm cases). It hereby goes beyond the scope of controlled psychological autopsy studies in suicide research with comparison of two groups only [16, 17, 25, 66, 67] and allows examination of the specific factors associated with a fatal act in comparison to non-fatal but severe self-harm acts. One exception with the use of three groups is the case-control study by Nock et al [15], conducted with an army population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Although structured interviews were conducted in all the studies, the interviewer was not blinded to case-control status and hence ascertainment bias was observed in all studies with a control group. 27,[29][30][31][32][33] One study used different assessment methods for cases and controls (telephonic interview for all controls vs a mixture of face-to-face and telephonic interview for cases). 32 Overall, two studies were rated as high-quality and 29,30 four as moderate-quality 27,31,32,34 ; two others could not be assessed on six of the eight items due to the lack of a control group, and hence, the overall quality cannot be commented upon.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%