2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-016-3001-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A push-pull double-contact MEMS relay fabricated by MetalMUMPs process

Abstract: pull movements of leverages and torsion springs, high isolations (Hah et al. 2000) or high C off /C on ratio (Rangra et al. 2005) or high power handing (Song et al. 2012) MEMS relays are demonstrated. By using magnetostatic latching and electrothermal actuation, a bistable push-pull MEMS switch with lower power consumption is reported (Wu et al. 2010). However, the toggle and the leverage structures of these push-pull MEMS relays are not only hard to process but also complex to control.To retain the advantages… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contact resistance directly influences the amount of joule heating, and in turn influences the reliability of MEMS relays, and a low contact resistance is always desirable [2,6,[25][26][27]. Song et al designed a stacked-electrode structure, a flexible polymer BCB was used as the substrate of the drain electrode, the flexible polymer significantly reduced the effective hardness of the contact material, and a minimum contact resistance of 5 mΩ was achieved [19].…”
Section: Contact Resistance Of Mems Relaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact resistance directly influences the amount of joule heating, and in turn influences the reliability of MEMS relays, and a low contact resistance is always desirable [2,6,[25][26][27]. Song et al designed a stacked-electrode structure, a flexible polymer BCB was used as the substrate of the drain electrode, the flexible polymer significantly reduced the effective hardness of the contact material, and a minimum contact resistance of 5 mΩ was achieved [19].…”
Section: Contact Resistance Of Mems Relaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in figure 1(d), we have integrated the combs [21] into the micro cantilever to decrease the mass and area of the device. On one hand, compared to the designs shown in figure 1(a) [12][13][14][15][16]21], the mass of the movable structure of the device was lower, and the speed response becomes better. On the other hand, compared to the cantilever designs shown in figure 1(c) [22-24, 30, 31], our design could boost the driving force, and obtain lower pull-in voltage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Decreasing the pull-in voltage and increasing the switching speed are two attractive but contradictory research directions. As shown in figure 1(a), one effective method for the inplane actuators is adopting a large number of driving combs [12][13][14][15][16]. More combs generate a larger driving force, and the actuator can be pulled-in by lower voltage [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%