New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism 2011 Help me understand this report
A Pyrrhonian Plato? Again On Sextus On Aenesidemus On Plato
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
1
Citation Types
0
1
0
Year Published
2015
2019
Publication Types
Select...
3
2
1
Relationship
0
6
Authors
Journals
Cited by 22 publications
(1 citation statement)
References 0 publications
0
1
0
“…At one point Sextus compares his own view on Plato's relation to scepticism with that of Aenesidemus (PH 1.222); unfortunately the text is corrupt, so we cannot simply read what he said Aenesidemus' position on this was. I have argued elsewhere that Sextus is here agreeing with Aenesidemus (Bett 2006); see also Spinelli 2000, Bonazzi 2011. I therefore do not treat this as a case of intra-Pyrrhonist dispute; but for another reading see Ioppolo 2009, 52-74.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 95%
“…At one point Sextus compares his own view on Plato's relation to scepticism with that of Aenesidemus (PH 1.222); unfortunately the text is corrupt, so we cannot simply read what he said Aenesidemus' position on this was. I have argued elsewhere that Sextus is here agreeing with Aenesidemus (Bett 2006); see also Spinelli 2000, Bonazzi 2011. I therefore do not treat this as a case of intra-Pyrrhonist dispute; but for another reading see Ioppolo 2009, 52-74.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 95%
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
