A qualitative examination of policy and structural factors driving care workers’ adverse experiences in long-term residential care facilities for older adults in Cape Town

Abstract

Background There is lack of adequate training and policy support for employed care workers (CWs) employed in the South African (SA) older persons’ sector. Existing literature neglects the influence of training and policy support on CWs’ experiences in long-term care (LTC) for older adults in residential care facilities (RCFs). We investigated the ways in which CWs’ experiences are rooted in the lack of adequate training and policy support. Methods Qualitative data was collected through focus group (FG) interviews with 32 CWs employed in RCFs in the City of Cape Town. Data was also collected using semi-structured interviews with representatives of five RCFs for older adults and four training organisations providing CW training in the City of Cape Town, South Africa. Results Despite some positive caregiving experiences, CWs face role ambiguity and experience care work as a ‘career-less job’. They also face poor employment conditions, negative interpersonal relations at work, and role overload. They are not coping with the demands of LTC due to role overload, and lack of basic caregiving skills, coping skills and socio-emotional support. Their motivation to cope and provide quality care is hamstrung by their experiences of role ambiguity, poor employment conditions, negative interpersonal relations at work, and lack of career growth opportunities. Conclusions Findings suggest that CWs’ experiences derive from the policy and structural context of caregiving. Policy inadequacies and lack of structural support create conditions for adverse conditions which negatively impact on CWs motivation and ability to cope with the demands of LTC. Lack of policy implementation presents structural barriers to quality LTC in the older persons’ sector. Implementation of policies and systems for professionalising care work is long overdue.

Challenges of caregivers providing care to children with disabilities at non-governmental organisations in Tshwane townships, South Africa

“…Some caregivers reported that they were sent on training only after starting their jobs or received 'on the spot' training from other caregivers or given instruction by NGO managers on what to do. Similar to the current study, Mapira, Kelly and Geffen (2019) found that most community workers had to assume duties without having undergone the necessary training. The results of the current study are also consistent with a study by Burgdorf et al (2019:835), published in the JAMA Internal Medicine Journal, which revealed that more than three-quarters of caregivers are actively performing their caregiving roles without having undergone any training.…”

Barriers to providing long-term care insurance services by direct care workers: a qualitative study in Shandong Province, China

“…A study of South African LTC workers showed that caregivers' motivation to provide quality care is hindered by role ambiguity, harsh employment conditions, negative interpersonal relationships at work, and role overload. These unfavorable conditions are created by policy de cits and a lack of structural support [ 23 ]. A study in Hangzhou, China, showed that low education level, long working hours, and low compensation of care workers were barriers to the development of LTC services [ 24 ].…”

Barriers to providing internet-based home care services for urban older adults in China: a qualitative study of the service providers

“…Salary, workload, and professional identity affect the job satisfaction of front-line workers [ 80 ], and consequently affect work performance. A study from South Africa showed that caregivers face poor employment conditions, negative relationships, and role overload [ 81 ]. According to research by the Social Welfare Center of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, workers providing care services are characterized by high turnover rate, high labor intensity, low wage income, low social status, and low service level [ 82 ].…”