A Qualitative Investigation of Supervisees' Experiences of Triadic Supervision

Lawson, Gerard; Hein, Serge F.; Stuart, Carolyn L.

doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00129.x

Cited by 27 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For future research to include other evaluation methods (e.g., survey questionnaires) to determine the effectiveness of this and other triadic models would be valuable. More generally, although we have used interviews to investigate various aspects of triadic supervision (Hein & Lawson, 2008;Lawson et al, in press), we believe that other qualitative data collection methods (e.g., participant observation, discourse analysis) may be valuable in increasing the understanding of this form of supervision.…”

Section: Implications For Further Practice and Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Model for Using Triadic Supervision in Counselor Preparation Programs

Lawson

Hein

Getz

2009

Couns Edu & Supervision

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (2001) has approved the use of triadic supervision as an alternative to individual supervision in clinical instruction. However, literature describing this mode of supervision is very limited. A model for triadic supervision is described, including presession planning, in-session strategies, and administrative considerations and supervisee evaluation. An evaluation of the model from 2 recent studies is also discussed, and recommendations are provided for using triadic supervision in counselor preparation.Counselor supervision is one of the most direct and intensive ways to intervene in the development of counselors-in-training. In 2001, the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) revised the standards for supervision of counselors-in-training to include triadic supervision as an approved modality. The triadic supervision approach is defined by CACREP as "a tutorial and mentoring relationship between a supervisor and two counseling students" (p. 105) that involves all three members simultaneously. Although the research and literature on individual and group supervision is extensive, relatively little is known about triadic supervision in the form articulated by CACREP.This article describes the triadic supervision literature, the strengths and limitations of this approach to supervision, and the implementation and evaluation of a specific form of triadic supervision in a counselor education program at one university. The model for triadic supervision described herein also provides a guide for the interpersonal and counseling supervision skills necessary to work effectively within this supervision structure.

show abstract

Section: Implications For Further Practice and Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Model for Using Triadic Supervision in Counselor Preparation Programs

Lawson

Hein

Getz

2009

Couns Edu & Supervision

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One recent qualitative study has given attention to the impact of triadic supervision on supervisees (Lawson et al 2009). The study reflected the experience of six masters-level students who were at differing points within their programs.…”

Section: Contemporary Literature and Research On Triadic Supervisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Counselor Trainees’ Experiences in Triadic Supervision: A Qualitative Exploration of Transcendent Themes

Stinchfield

Hill

Kleist

2010

Int J Adv Counselling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In an investigation of their triadic supervision model, Lawson and colleagues (Hein & Lawson, 2008, 2009; Hein, Lawson, & Rodriguez, 2011; Lawson, Hein, & Stuart, 2009, 2010) interviewed six supervisees (practicum students) and six supervisors (doctoral students) in one counsellor education programme. Supervisee peer matching (e.g., similar skill level) was emphasised by both groups; mismatches reportedly reduced productivity, truncated feedback, and limited support.…”

Section: Triadic and Group Peer Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dyadic, triadic, and group models of peer supervision/consultation: What are their components, and is there evidence of their effectiveness?

Borders

2012

Clinical Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Models that meet the Psychology Board of Australia's definition of peer consultation include dyadic, triadic, and group formats. Components of these models (e.g., goals, theoretical basis, role of leader, members' roles, structure, and steps in procedure, stages in group development) are presented, and evidence of their effectiveness is reviewed. Psychologists are encouraged to identify the model components and goals that match their own learning goals for continuing professional development.

show abstract

A Qualitative Investigation of Supervisees' Experiences of Triadic Supervision

Cited by 27 publications

References 19 publications

A Model for Using Triadic Supervision in Counselor Preparation Programs

A Model for Using Triadic Supervision in Counselor Preparation Programs

Counselor Trainees’ Experiences in Triadic Supervision: A Qualitative Exploration of Transcendent Themes

Dyadic, triadic, and group models of peer supervision/consultation: What are their components, and is there evidence of their effectiveness?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About