2009 Seventh ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/sera.2009.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quality Model for Evaluating Software-as-a-Service in Cloud Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on service characteristics, a list of essential and high-level features of cloud services were discussed in several studies (Alhamad et al, 2010;Repschlaeger et al, 2012;Tamburri and Lago, 2011). Other work proposed methods for evaluating quality of services (Garg et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2009), and cost modeling (Khajeh-Hosseini et al, 2012;Klems et al, 2009;Mach and Schikuta, 2011). Based on such requirements with the goal of reducing barrier-to-entry, concrete factors that could potentially inhibit cloud adoption need to be identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on service characteristics, a list of essential and high-level features of cloud services were discussed in several studies (Alhamad et al, 2010;Repschlaeger et al, 2012;Tamburri and Lago, 2011). Other work proposed methods for evaluating quality of services (Garg et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2009), and cost modeling (Khajeh-Hosseini et al, 2012;Klems et al, 2009;Mach and Schikuta, 2011). Based on such requirements with the goal of reducing barrier-to-entry, concrete factors that could potentially inhibit cloud adoption need to be identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the study was angled from a product planning perspective, the obtained results confirm the importance of analytics for product management beyond product launch support [64] and product validation [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…They provide measurements that are not affected by power and politics for guiding sales and marketing [12], for informing usability, reliability, and quality of service engineering [13,14], and to support quality assurance . Despite their importance, analytics have not been used yet for guiding product planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common metrics proposed for scalability evaluation assume linear scal-ing [5,11,9,19,22], yet many use arbitrary thresholds for qualifying a system to be scalable [20]. Our aim is to provide components to perform automated analysis in order to verify if system performance remains the same when resource allocation is changed because of variatons in workload [25].…”
Section: Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%