2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As for DM techniques applied to MRI data, several work has been done, especially for MRI clustering, as in [16][17][18] to mention some proposals. Most proposed methods are based on the K-Means algorithm [7].…”
Section: Mri Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for DM techniques applied to MRI data, several work has been done, especially for MRI clustering, as in [16][17][18] to mention some proposals. Most proposed methods are based on the K-Means algorithm [7].…”
Section: Mri Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most proposed methods are based on the K-Means algorithm [7]. In [16], a quantitative comparison of MRI cluster analysis techniques has been performed and described. With respect to the proposed evaluation, results clearly shown that methods based on the neural gas algorithm [23] and on the K-Means one perform significantly better than all the other methods.…”
Section: Mri Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os métodos não-paramétricos são baseados em geral na classificação voxel a voxel das séries temporais normalizadas utilizando métodos não-supervisionados, tais como os mapas de k-médias, os mapas auto-organizados e os mapas fuzzy cmédias (Chen et al, 2006;Dimitriadou et al, 2004;Windischberger et al, 2003;Somorjai et al, 2002).…”
Section: Métodos De Detecção Não-paramétricos Multiespectraisunclassified
“…Functional images were acquired from six normal volunteers using a T 2 * -weighted gradient-echo single-shot EPI sequence (TR ϭ 3 seconds, TE ϭ 50 msec, FOV ϭ 250 ϫ 250 ϫ 100 mm 3 , matrix size ϭ 64 ϫ 64 ϫ 20) on a 1.5-Tesla Siemens Vision MRI scanner. The subjects performed a finger-to-thumb opposition task.…”
Section: Finger Tapping Fmri Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the structure of noise is not known and still is an open problem (2). Also, the number of artifacts and their characteristics cannot be predicted or controlled (3). Therefore, validity of model-based statistical methods depends on the extent to which the data satisfy their underlying assumptions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%