2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-9635(02)00268-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative study of the nano-scratch behavior of boron and carbon nitride films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15] Perhaps the fluctuating profiles indicate that the film was partially delaminated by ploughing or was peeled off during S testing. [11,16] The S and final-scan profiles of f-GTST 15% and f-GTST 20% are better and shallower than the S and final-scan profiles of f-GTST 10% (see Figure 2c and 2d), indicating better layer structures and mechanical properties (H, E and S resistance) due to an adequate fraction of TTB in the films and the formation of the desirable microstructure. For both films, there are very few seriously abrupt changes in the S and the final-scan profiles, implying that the films did not peel off during S ramping.…”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15] Perhaps the fluctuating profiles indicate that the film was partially delaminated by ploughing or was peeled off during S testing. [11,16] The S and final-scan profiles of f-GTST 15% and f-GTST 20% are better and shallower than the S and final-scan profiles of f-GTST 10% (see Figure 2c and 2d), indicating better layer structures and mechanical properties (H, E and S resistance) due to an adequate fraction of TTB in the films and the formation of the desirable microstructure. For both films, there are very few seriously abrupt changes in the S and the final-scan profiles, implying that the films did not peel off during S ramping.…”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The procedure was similar to that presented in detail elsewhere. [11] Before scratching, an initial surface profile of the samples was detected by pre-scanning the surface with the indenter under a low load of 100 mN. Depths of scratches with increasing scratch length were measured in-situ by profiling the surface of the film before, during and after the scratch test, resulting in a total length (pre-scan track) of 700 mm for the test while the scratch length (scratch scan) was 600 mm as applied to all f-MST i% .…”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, although the load-dependent friction behaviors during nanoscratch tests have been reported for different materials [55][56], influences of indenter type on this load-dependent friction have been scarcely investigated. The present study shows the friction-load dependency is significantly affected by the indenter type and qualitative explanations for this indenter geometrical effect are given based on certain theories and assumptions; however, further studies involving quantitative analysis of the geometrical effects on scratching friction are warranted.…”
Section: Geometrical Effects On Scratching Frictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H/E can provide important information on the mechanical resistance of the material. The relative high value of H/E ratio reveals the high elastic deformation during contact, making it an excellent candidate for applications where both wear resistance and elasticity are required [8]. It has been found that the max load, 1)d r /d m , hardness, modulus, and H/E of GT35 were highest, followed by 9Cr18 and 40CrNiMo.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%