2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-004-8099-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate Effects on the Micro/Nanomechanical Properties of TiN Coatings

Abstract: Nanoindentation and nanoscratch tests were performed for titanium nitride (TiN) coatings on different tool steel substrates to investigate the indentation/scratch induced deformation behavior of the coatings and the adhesion of the coating-substrate interfaces and their tribological property. In this work, TiN coatings with a thickness of about 500 nm were grown on GT35, 9Cr18 and 40CrNiMo steels using vacuum magnetic-filtering arc plasma deposition. In the nanoindentation tests, the hardness and modulus curve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results above, the relative errors of both the mean Young's modulus and the mean hardness for the living and the dead wings are computed to be less than 4%. However, under the tested conditions that we measured the mechanical properties of the membranes, the testing processes might induce a testing error to be about 5% [15,16]. Therefore, if we consider the testing deviations derived from the testing system itself, such as the instability of the indenter, we can approximately deem that there are not differences between the material properties of the wing membranes of the living and the dead dragonflies.…”
Section: Mechanical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results above, the relative errors of both the mean Young's modulus and the mean hardness for the living and the dead wings are computed to be less than 4%. However, under the tested conditions that we measured the mechanical properties of the membranes, the testing processes might induce a testing error to be about 5% [15,16]. Therefore, if we consider the testing deviations derived from the testing system itself, such as the instability of the indenter, we can approximately deem that there are not differences between the material properties of the wing membranes of the living and the dead dragonflies.…”
Section: Mechanical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H/E r values for the coatings were found to be in the 0.05-0.06 range for all the coatings studied. The moderate value of H/E r resilience to elastic/plastic deformation of the substrate during contact making the coating system good candidate for applications where both wear resistance and coating resilience is required [23]. [24,25], which was 0.07.…”
Section: Nanomechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C n are constants that depend on the indenter geometry and are given by calibrating initially a standard sample with known material properties [15,16]. In the present study, C 0 = 21.4, C 1 = 2100, and take the rests to be zero.…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the diamond indenter used in our experiments, E i = 1141 GPa and ν i = 0.07. Also, in the present calculation, Poisson's ratio of the specimen is taken as 0.4 for macromolecular materials [14][15][16]. The hardness of the material is defined by:…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%