2009
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quasi optimal Petrov–Galerkin method for Helmholtz problem

Abstract: SUMMARYA Petrov-Galerkin finite element formulation is introduced for Helmholtz problem in two dimensions using polynomial weighting functions. At each node of the mesh, a global basis function for the weighting space is obtained adding to the bilinear C 0 Lagrangian weighting function linear combinations of polynomial bubbles defined on a macroelement containing this node. Quasi optimal weighting functions, with the same support of the corresponding global test functions, are obtained after computing the coef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for low-order approximations dense meshes must be enhanced with stabilized formulations to control dispersion errors [44][45][46]. In spite of the improved e ciency of high-order approximations [47,48] DOF when 100 nodes are used for parameters ✓ and !.…”
Section: The Proper Generalized Decomposition Methods (Pgd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, for low-order approximations dense meshes must be enhanced with stabilized formulations to control dispersion errors [44][45][46]. In spite of the improved e ciency of high-order approximations [47,48] DOF when 100 nodes are used for parameters ✓ and !.…”
Section: The Proper Generalized Decomposition Methods (Pgd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QOPG finite element method, for the Helmholtz problem we present in [30], is also closely related to the present finite difference method in the sense that it is based on a minimization of a least-squares residual of discrete plane waves at a macroelement level (stencil) or, more precisely, at the level n = 1 with A i = A 1 i . QOPG is also capable of reducing phase error on uniform, non-uniform and unstructured meshes, and to naturally impose non-essential boundary conditions (Robin or Neumann) but not to deal with A i = A n i , with n>1.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The mixed formulation and the discontinuity of the functional spaces is needed to derive an easy, practical, and inexpensive way to compute the optimal test space. Compared to other PG approaches (e.g., [5] or [25]), the method may be difficult to implement within existing classical FEM codes, but fits perfectly within the framework of hybrid methods like the original DPG method developed in [6]. The essential difference is in the computation of optimal test functions, an operation performed purely on the element level using a simple preprocessing routine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%