2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36469-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Query Language for a Metadata Framework about Mathematical Resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A priority signature uses the functional notation with priority levels in place of the constructor and each argument. Priority levels are here named after their most representative operator, and are ordered in the usual way (e.g., 'times' represents higher priority than 'plus') 3 . For example, the priority sig-nature of math:Minus, plus(plus,times), says that substraction has the same priority level as addition, and is left associative.…”
Section: Labelling Of Expressions In Rdf Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A priority signature uses the functional notation with priority levels in place of the constructor and each argument. Priority levels are here named after their most representative operator, and are ordered in the usual way (e.g., 'times' represents higher priority than 'plus') 3 . For example, the priority sig-nature of math:Minus, plus(plus,times), says that substraction has the same priority level as addition, and is left associative.…”
Section: Labelling Of Expressions In Rdf Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When looking for integrals in x whose body contains x 2 , a textual search would have false positives such as 2x dx = x 2 + c (x 2 is not in the scope of ), and would have false negatives such as y 2 − y dy (y instead of x). On the contrary, the approaches based on a structured query language [1,3,6,13] correctly account for nested structures and bound variables by reasoning directly on the structure of expressions, and by using wild cards as place-holders for variables and sub-expressions. MathWebSearch [6] defines an XML query language that extends MathML.…”
Section: Query Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finding mathematical results: Based on the semantics and the structure of the formalized mathematics, it should be possible to find results easier. Querying based on the (meaningful) structure is already possible (implemented in the Helm system, see [23]), but more semantical querying would be welcome. This requires adding more meta-data.…”
Section: Why C-corn?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is formal-math search, such as the search systems developed and researched by Guidi et al [4,5], MoWGLI of the Helm project [12], and MIZAR [2]. Formal-math search systems are highly specialized and usually intended for advanced mathematicians, and are thus outside the scope of the paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%