2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-1211(99)00112-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A questionnaire survey about doctor–patient communication, compliance and locus of control among South Indian people with epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
38
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient point of view of the doctor – patient relationship was examined, and it was discovered that amount of visits and adequate communication between the two individuals improved adherence. [9] The main factor associated with healthcare system includes availability and accessibility. Absence of accessibility to healthcare, long waiting time for hospital visits, and difficulty in getting prescription filled, and unsatisfactory clinic visits may contribute to poor compliance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient point of view of the doctor – patient relationship was examined, and it was discovered that amount of visits and adequate communication between the two individuals improved adherence. [9] The main factor associated with healthcare system includes availability and accessibility. Absence of accessibility to healthcare, long waiting time for hospital visits, and difficulty in getting prescription filled, and unsatisfactory clinic visits may contribute to poor compliance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este estudo foi analisado em outra publicação. O teste MannWhitney identificou um p=0,005 comprovando a A preocupação com a questão de diferenciar a percepção do sujeito sobre o controle de crises da frequência real de crises abre a possibilidade de se investigar questões subjetivas do controle do bem estar psicológico já identificados por Wilson et al 26 e Gopinath et al 27 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The difference between the patients and controls might, therefore, have been overestimated. Second, our study results might have been contaminated by social desirability bias, i.e., patients often respond in a way that they perceive to be desirable rather than state their actual perception [22,35]. Third, although the items we used to ascertain sexuality are fairly standard, our questionnaire has not been validated for the local population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%