2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quick snip – A study of the impact of outpatient tongue tie release on neonatal growth and breastfeeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
53
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol correlates anatomic and functional aspects. That may contribute to an accurate diagnosis and treatment avoiding early weaning and/or poor weight gain [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . The aim of this study is to identify the anatomical characteristics of the lingual frenulum interfering with the functions of sucking and swallowing in full-term infants in order to re-design the experimental protocol proposed by Martinelli et al 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol correlates anatomic and functional aspects. That may contribute to an accurate diagnosis and treatment avoiding early weaning and/or poor weight gain [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . The aim of this study is to identify the anatomical characteristics of the lingual frenulum interfering with the functions of sucking and swallowing in full-term infants in order to re-design the experimental protocol proposed by Martinelli et al 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty-six studies reported that they looked for harms; either reporting actual harms or reporting that they found none. These included 5 RCTs, 7-11 1 cohort study, 12 25 case series, 13,15,16,[18][19][20][21][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]32,33,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and 15 case reports. [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] Most studies reporting harms information explicitly noted that no significant harms were observed (n = 17) 7,[9][10][11]13,15,18,20,24,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One was an RCT 11 (fair quality), 1 was a poor-quality retrospective cohort study, 4 and the remaining study was a case series. 9 All studies were singlecenter or single-surgeon studies. Two studies were conducted in the United Kingdom 9,11 and 1 study in the United States.…”
Section: Feeding Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementary bottle-feedings decreased over time in the case series. 9 With only 2 comparative studies, both with significant methodological limitations, including heterogeneous populations and measured outcomes, existing data are insufficient to draw conclusions about the benefits of surgical interventions on medium-and longterm or nonbreastfeeding feeding (ie, bottle) outcomes for infants and children with ankyloglossia.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%