Volume 1: Turbomachinery 1982
DOI: 10.1115/82-gt-101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Radial Inflow Turbine Impeller for Improved Off-Design Performance

Abstract: Given the instantaneous operating conditions of the radial inflow turbine on a diesel engine and the possible requirement of a variable geometry turbine casing, an alternate approach was used to design an impeller which could accommodate the large variations in inlet states. Several impeller designs were generated and tested. Each was found to give a performance advantage in some portion of the turbine map. A blunt inlet shape design was found to give the best performance at all suspected inlet conditions. A f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inviscid numerical simulation has been presented by several authors (e.g. Mulloy and Weber (1982), Choo and Civinskas (1985)). A typical result is shown in Fig 1, adapted from the work of Molloy and Weber by addition of lines of circles which show average velocities between hub and shroud.…”
Section: Relative Flow In the Exducermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inviscid numerical simulation has been presented by several authors (e.g. Mulloy and Weber (1982), Choo and Civinskas (1985)). A typical result is shown in Fig 1, adapted from the work of Molloy and Weber by addition of lines of circles which show average velocities between hub and shroud.…”
Section: Relative Flow In the Exducermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the appropriate radius is neither the hydraulic or rms radius rh (= (R2 + r2 )/2) nor the average radius r (_ (R + r)/2). In fact : r<r,<rh (6) The work of Choo and Civinskas applies to the turbine tested by McLallin and Haas (1980). This turbine produced approximately 16 kW at 35000 rpm, and relative air velocities were of the order of 200 m/sec.…”
Section: Mass Flow Reference Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%