2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A radiocarbon chronology for the complete Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transitional sequence of Les Cottés (France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The oldest of the lower limits of these authors' 95.4 % confi dence intervals for Isturitz's modeled cal BP results is 41,840, and the corresponding youngest upper limit is 40,078; both are fully consistent with the 39.9-41.5 ka cal BP range modeled for the entire technocomplex. The same applies to Les Cottés, dates for which have since been published (Talamo et al 2012 ). At this site, not only does the Protoaurignacian overlie the Châtelperronian, it is also separated from it by a 12 cm-thick sterile layer.…”
Section: Protoaurignacianmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The oldest of the lower limits of these authors' 95.4 % confi dence intervals for Isturitz's modeled cal BP results is 41,840, and the corresponding youngest upper limit is 40,078; both are fully consistent with the 39.9-41.5 ka cal BP range modeled for the entire technocomplex. The same applies to Les Cottés, dates for which have since been published (Talamo et al 2012 ). At this site, not only does the Protoaurignacian overlie the Châtelperronian, it is also separated from it by a 12 cm-thick sterile layer.…”
Section: Protoaurignacianmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Further evidence for the EA is also found in US02 and is referred to, at this site, as the Upper EA (UEA). The remaining and inter-stratified units (US 01, 03, 05 and 07) are virtually archaeologically sterile (see Table 2 in Talamo et al, 2012). These archaeologically sterile units clearly separate the major archaeological industries.…”
Section: Site Setting Stratigraphy and Archaeological Contextmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, only 0.5% modern contamination of a sample that dates to 40 ka BP, will result in an underestimation of 4.4 ka and, thus, a measured age of 35.6 ka BP (Higham, 2011), or 1% modern contamination of a sample >60 ka old, will result in a measured age of~37 ka BP . A swath of recent 14 C dating studies have confirmed how earlier 14 C ages produced on charcoal and bone from sites associated with the MP/UP transition have, in many cases, been underestimations because of small-scale post-depositional contamination by younger carbon that was not removed adequately during the laboratory pretreatment of the samples (e.g., Mellars, 2006;Higham et al, 2010Higham et al, , 2011Higham et al, , 2012Talamo et al, 2012;Wood et al, 2013). Application of newgeneration pretreatment techniques, such as acid-base wet oxidation and stepped-combustion (ABOX-SC) procedures for charcoal (Bird et al, 1999), molecular ultrafiltration procedures for bone collagen and X-ray diffraction and density separation procedures for shell (Douka et al, 2010), have been pushing back the ages for this critical period within the European Palaeolithic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…ka (Talamo et al, 2012) that bracket the layer of sample LC10-07. Thus, although the different approaches produce equally accurate ages for this particular sample, there are mathematical grounds to support the validity of the intensity-subtraction procedure for robust age estimation more generally.…”
Section: A Correction Methods For Residual Dosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these are archaeological sites that have been dated using the optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) signal from quartz (R.G.R. and Z.J., unpublished data), as well as radiocarbon dating of bone at Les Cottés (Talamo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Sample Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%