This editorial accompanies an article by Alhomary et al., Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 1151-61. Awake fibreoptic intubation has been considered the technique of choice when managing many types of predicted difficult airway. In principle, if a patient is maintaining the patency of their own airway, there is a margin of safety which is lost if general anaesthesia is induced before the trachea is intubated. Despite this, the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists (NAP4) reported that awake fibreoptic intubation was not used as the primary airway plan for many highrisk patients [1]. However, awake fibreoptic intubation is a complex skill requiring regular practice to maintain competence. It is easy to see how this potentially difficult task, performed on a high-risk patient group, in departments where numbers of awake fibreoptic intubations may be low, may pose a problem; and in consequence, it is understandable that an anaesthetist might opt for a more familiar, but less appropriate, technique [1]. It is of course also true that awake fibreoptic intubation is not suitable for tracheal intubation in all patients with airway problems, and it is not always successful; NAP4 demonstrated that it failed for a variety of reasons. Most commonly these were airway obstruction, lack of patient co-operation and difficulty recognising airway anatomy due to excess secretions, blood or suction failure [1].
Changing practiceThe NAP4 was published in 2011. However, anaesthetic practice is ever changing. In 2016, Ahmad and Bailey argued in this journal that awake fibreoptic intubation was becoming obsolete [2]. Later that year, reviewing the revised Difficulty Airway Society's (DAS) guidelines on difficulties in intubation, Marshall and Pandit suggested that "if it is essential to maximise the first attempt success rate, and if it is the case that videolaryngoscopes yield higher success in visualising the glottis, then it follows that these should become first-line devices in most if not all tracheal intubations" [3]. A Cochrane systematic review of videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in adults concluded that "failed intubations were significantly fewer when videolaryngoscopy was used in participants with anticipated difficult airway." [4], although a similar review found no evidence of benefit in children [5]. In addition to this, the recent DAS guidelines on intubation in critically ill adults acknowledge the role of videolaryngoscopy [6], stating that "if difficult laryngoscopy is predicted then videolaryngoscopy should be considered from the outset". However, these publications deal largely with the management of intubation in patients who are anaesthetised. This month's issue of Anaesthesia presents a systematic review comparing awake videolaryngoscopy and awake fibreoptic intubation in patients with anticipated airway difficulty [7]. Using standard systematic review methodology, the authors included eight studies overall. One study could not be included in the quantitative meta-analysis,...