2009
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2008.0428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized, Clinical Trial to Compare Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Subsequent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Primary Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration During Cholecystectomy in Higher Risk Patients with Choledocholithiasis

Abstract: There was no difference between approaches to duct clearance in terms of postoperative stay, complications, or conversion in higher risk patients, but the laparoscopic approach was more effective and efficient and avoided unnecessary procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
90
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its efficiency and safety in the elderly age group and those with comorbidities remains debatable. It is interesting to note that your own study had brought out that laparoscopic CBD exploration is equally safe in the elderly [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its efficiency and safety in the elderly age group and those with comorbidities remains debatable. It is interesting to note that your own study had brought out that laparoscopic CBD exploration is equally safe in the elderly [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two procedures for uncomplicated gallstones and CBD stones had nearly similar complication rates, which were 7 and 11.1% (p > 0.05), respectively. Noble et al (28) described enhanced attainment rates for laparoscopic versus endoscopic management even for higher-risk patients in complications and hospital stay. Difficulty with cannulation and impacted stones represent the common causes of failure with ERC procedures (28,29).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noble et al (28) described enhanced attainment rates for laparoscopic versus endoscopic management even for higher-risk patients in complications and hospital stay. Difficulty with cannulation and impacted stones represent the common causes of failure with ERC procedures (28,29). The main reason for unsuccessful clearance following ERC was impacted stones in 13.1% of the patients (26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conjunction with intraoperative biliary ductal imaging, LCBDE allows for the management of common bile duct stones during one procedure. This technique has been shown to have a statistically significant reduction in total costs, length of hospital stay from 98 h with ERCP to 55 h, and number of procedures performed [19,20] . In addition, a trend towards better ductal clearance has been demonstrated [19] .…”
Section: Cholecystitismentioning
confidence: 99%