A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Platelet-Rich Plasma, Low-Level Laser Therapy, and Complex Decongestive Physiotherapy in Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema

Akgül, Ahmet; Tarakçı, Ela; Arman, Nilay; Civi, T.; Irmak, Selin

doi:10.1089/lrb.2019.0064

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous researchers utilizing TDC to assess the lower extremity have used segmental measuring points to be representative of the whole leg [21,23,[29][30][31]43,52]. As an example, Jonsson et al looked at 14 different measurement points on the lower leg.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Variation in Leg Tissue Dielectric Constant Values of Healthy Young Adult Females With and Without Compression Bandaging

Ehmann¹,

Mayrovitz²

2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The clinical efficacy of a compression application has been often limited to the assessment of the change in limb volume, change in clinical symptoms (i.e., wound size, pain, range of motion, incidence of cellulitis), or vascular hemodynamics of the whole limb. Assessing compression-related biophysical changes of a localized area, such as around a wound, or in an area outside of an extremity cannot be objectively assessed by these measurements. Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) values, which provide a measure of the local tissue water (LTW) content, offer an alternative method to document variation in the LTW content of the skin in a specific location. The goals of the present research were (1) to characterize TDC values, expressed as percentage tissue water, from multiple areas along the medial aspect of the lower leg of healthy volunteers and (2) to explore the potential utilization of the TDC values to assess change in tissue water content in a localized area following compression applications. Methods TDC was measured at 10, 20, 30, and 40 cm proximal to the medial malleolus on the medial aspect of the right leg of 18 young adult healthy women with an age range of 18-23 years and a body mass index of 18.7 to 30.7kg/m 2. . TDC was measured at baseline and after 10 minutes of exercise with compression in place on three separate days during which three different compression applications were assessed: a longitudinal elastic stockinette, a two-layer cohesive compression kit, and a combination of the two. Leg circumferences and compression-related interface pressures were also measured. Results Test-Retest Reliability of circumferential measurements and TDC values evaluated using Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1 ) revealed excellent and moderate-to-good reliability, respectively. Analysis of TDC values along the length of the limb using Friedman’s test, revealed a small but statistically significant overall difference among baseline TDC values attributable to a smaller value at 40 cm. The largest difference in cumulative average was 7.7% which occurred between 20 and 40 cm, with all other differences between locations less than 1%. No significant differences between the compression applications were observed. Conclusion The present findings demonstrate the utility of TDC measurements as a modality to assess compression-related changes in the legs of healthy women as a foundation for their potential use in assessing outcomes of compression treatments for persons with lower extremity edema or lymphedema. The absence of a significant change in TDC values in these healthy non-edematous conditions and the demonstrated reliability of the TDC measurements on three different days provides further support for the utility of such applications of TDC measurements. The extension to patients with lower extremity edema or lymphedema needs to be evaluated.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This research is focused on the upper extremity, the breast, and/or trunk [24,[34][35][36][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. There are few studies evaluating the utilization of TDC to quantitatively assess the clinical presentation of lower extremity edema and/or lymphedema [23,30,31,43,[52][53][54][55].…”

Section: Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%