2014
DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized, controlled trial of Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT) for outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

Abstract: Social cognitive intervention is a feasible and promising approach to improving social functioning among individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Dose-response findings suggest that delivering social cognitive interventions with greater frequency may maximize their benefit to patients. Research on social cognitive interventions is still young and effects from well-controlled trials have been inconsistent. It is not yet clear which components of social cognitive training may be the key active ingredie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
114
3
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
114
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…And, while Fiszdon and Reddy (2012) included an analysis of comprehensive social cognitive treatment programs in their analysis of "broad-based" programs of social cognition, they did not provide a quantitative analysis of these treatment effects via the analysis of study effect-sizes. In addition, a growing number of studies, the majority of high design quality (e.g., Roberts et al, 2014), have been published over the past three years. Indeed, eight controlled trials of comprehensive programs of social cognitive training consisting of 378 participants have been published since the Kurtz & Richardson, 2012 review, while 6 novel trials of social cognitive training consisting of 281 participants have been published since the Fiszdon & Reddy, 2012 review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And, while Fiszdon and Reddy (2012) included an analysis of comprehensive social cognitive treatment programs in their analysis of "broad-based" programs of social cognition, they did not provide a quantitative analysis of these treatment effects via the analysis of study effect-sizes. In addition, a growing number of studies, the majority of high design quality (e.g., Roberts et al, 2014), have been published over the past three years. Indeed, eight controlled trials of comprehensive programs of social cognitive training consisting of 378 participants have been published since the Kurtz & Richardson, 2012 review, while 6 novel trials of social cognitive training consisting of 281 participants have been published since the Fiszdon & Reddy, 2012 review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, eight controlled trials of comprehensive programs of social cognitive training consisting of 378 participants have been published since the Kurtz & Richardson, 2012 review, while 6 novel trials of social cognitive training consisting of 281 participants have been published since the Fiszdon & Reddy, 2012 review. These new trials have represented several of the largest sample studies in this research area to date (e.g., Hasson-Ohayon, Mashiach-Eizenberg, Avidan, Roberts, & Roe, 2014;Roberts et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zu diesen Faktoren zählen Depressivität, Ängstlichkeit, Sorgenund Grübelverhalten [Freeman et al, 2012;Hartley et al, 2014], Schlaf [Freeman et al, 2012;Freeman et al, 2010] und Selbstwert [Thewissen et al, 2008;Smith et al, 2006]. Andere indirekte Ansät-ze haben das Ziel, kognitive Verarbeitungsstile (voreiliges Schlussfolgern (jumping-to-conclusions bias), einen personalen Kausalattributionsstil, Defizite in der Theory of Mind) zu verändern (Reasoning-Training: Waller et al [2015]; Social Cognition and Interaction Training: Roberts et al [2014]; Metakognitives Training: Moritz et al [2007]). …”
Section: Wahnsymptomatik Und Die Relevanz Von Stimmungsstabilisierungunclassified
“…eines Familienmitglieds, weiter zu üben. Eine randomisiert-kontrollierte Studie zeigte nach einer 6-wöchigen Intervention eine Verbesserung der sozialen Fertigkeiten sowie eine Reduktion der Negativsymptomatik [Roberts et al, 2014]. Ebenso zeigte sich in einer chinesischen Stichprobe im Vergleich zu einer Wartebedingung eine signifikante Verbesserung der Emotionswahrnehmung, des Einfühlungsvermögens, der Attributionstendenz und den sozialen Fertigkeiten [Wang et al, 2013].…”
Section: äHnliche Interventionenunclassified