1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf03015157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized doubleblind comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil anaesthesia for coronary artery surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our association of the drugs used with outcomes must be examined. High dose fentanyl has been associated with better cardiac outcome as compared to other anesthetics (5,6,7) as well as renal outcome (8). A study of high dose fentany I (mean dose 62.4 !J.g/kg, range 50-89 IJ.g/kg) (9) showed minor hemodynamic changes (increased heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and systemic vascular resistance with noxious stimulation), but another study examining…”
Section: Drugs and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our association of the drugs used with outcomes must be examined. High dose fentanyl has been associated with better cardiac outcome as compared to other anesthetics (5,6,7) as well as renal outcome (8). A study of high dose fentany I (mean dose 62.4 !J.g/kg, range 50-89 IJ.g/kg) (9) showed minor hemodynamic changes (increased heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and systemic vascular resistance with noxious stimulation), but another study examining…”
Section: Drugs and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I These include patient-specific variables such as left ventricle function and preoperative beta-adrenergic blockade, and anaesthetic variables such as premedication, the specific opioid chosen, the use of intravenous sedative-hypnotic agents, and the muscle relaxant. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Temporally, the relaxant is the last of these variables to exert its haemodynamic effect. Thus, the haemodynamic response to a given relaxant will vary from patient to patient and from one anaesthetic or experimental protocol to another.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%