2014
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201300062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized test for the conditional odds ratio of matched pairs in an inverse binomial sampling design

Abstract: Matched case-control paired data are commonly used to study the association between a disease and an exposure of interest. This work provides a consistent test for this association with respect to the conditional odds ratio (ORc), which is a measure of association that is also valid in prospective studies. We formulate the test from the maximum likelihood (ML) estimate of ORc by using data under inverse binomial sampling, in which individuals are selected sequentially to form matched pairs until for the first … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Setting p = π 01 π 10 +π 01 , the conditional probability of occurrence of [Y 1 < Y 2 ] when [Y 1 ̸ = Y 2 ], the testing problem is equivalent to that of testing H 0 : p = 1 2 against H 1 : p ̸ = 1 2 , which is same as the earlier one with p 0 = 1 2 . Bandyopadhyay et al (2014) work on this problem using a two-sided symmetric stopping rule. However, the present solution, based on a two-sided asymmetric stopping rule, provides the following alternative approach.…”
Section: An Application: a Test For Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setting p = π 01 π 10 +π 01 , the conditional probability of occurrence of [Y 1 < Y 2 ] when [Y 1 ̸ = Y 2 ], the testing problem is equivalent to that of testing H 0 : p = 1 2 against H 1 : p ̸ = 1 2 , which is same as the earlier one with p 0 = 1 2 . Bandyopadhyay et al (2014) work on this problem using a two-sided symmetric stopping rule. However, the present solution, based on a two-sided asymmetric stopping rule, provides the following alternative approach.…”
Section: An Application: a Test For Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%