Nucleoside analogs are associated with various mitochondrial toxicities, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to accommodate these differences solely in the context of DNA polymerase gamma inhibition. Therefore, we examined the toxicities of zidovudine (AZT) (10 and 50 M; 2.7 and 13.4 g/ml), didanosine (ddI) (10 and 50 M; 2.4 and 11.8 g/ml), and zalcitabine (ddC) (1 and 5 M; 0.21 and 1.1 g/ml) in HepG2 and H9c2 cells without the presumption of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) depletion. Ethidium bromide (EtBr) (0.5 g/ml; 1.3 M) was used as a positive control. AZT treatment resulted in metabolic disruption (increased lactate and superoxide) and increased cell mortality with decreased proliferation, while mtDNA remained unchanged or increased (HepG2 cells; 50 M AZT). ddC caused pronounced mtDNA depletion in HepG2 cells but not in H9c2 cells and increased mortality in HepG2 cells, but no significant metabolic disruption in either cell type. ddI caused a moderate depletion of mtDNA in both cell types but showed no other effects. EtBr exposure resulted in metabolic disruption, increased cell mortality with decreased cell proliferation, and mtDNA depletion in both cell types. We conclude that nucleoside analogs display unique toxicities within and between culture models, and therefore, care should be taken when generalizing about the mechanisms of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor toxicity. Additionally, mtDNA abundance does not necessarily correlate with metabolic disruption, especially in cell culture; careful discernment is recommended in this regard.Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) as a class represent one of the primary options for the treatment and prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Despite the vast amount of clinical and experimental data demonstrating their toxicity, NRTIs remain at the forefront of human immunodeficiency virus chemotherapy. This dominance is due to several factors, namely, their efficacy, lack of effective alternatives, and an accepted but imperfect risk-benefit approach (i.e., toxicity versus viral inhibition). The future prospects for their use over extended periods inspire an urgency to better understand the toxic mechanisms of these drugs in order to minimize further patient risk.By design, NRTIs share structural similarities with each other and with the endogenous nucleosides they mimic. Structure-activity assumptions would normally suggest that these compounds share similar mechanisms of toxicity; however, a survey of the literature involving NRTI research shows that the evidence paints a much more convoluted picture (34, 52). The distinctiveness and tissue specificities of NRTI toxicities suggests that unintended targets are varied among individual compounds within this family of drugs. Much of the variation in NRTI toxicity has been attributed to differing levels of prodrug activation in different tissues (reviewed in reference 21). The activities of NRTIs against viral reverse transcriptase and incorporation/termination of endogenous DNA b...