2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rapid and Sensitive Nucleic Acid Amplification Technique for Mycoplasma Screening of Cell Therapy Products

Abstract: Mycoplasma species (spp.) bacteria can infect cell cultures, posing a potential threat to recipients of cell therapy products. Conventional Mycoplasma testing methods are highly sensitive but typically require a minimum of 28 days to produce results. This delay is problematic if rapid results are needed to inform treatment decisions. Nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT) methods have been gaining favor for Mycoplasma testing due to their speed and specificity; however, they must first be qualified as meet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MEF cell lines were authenticated by short tandem repeat profiling conducted by Labcorp. The cell lines were free of mycoplasma as determined by PCR based detection ( Dreolini et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MEF cell lines were authenticated by short tandem repeat profiling conducted by Labcorp. The cell lines were free of mycoplasma as determined by PCR based detection ( Dreolini et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of this study is the use of mycoplasma gDNA for spiking instead of live or inactivated mycoplasma. NAT method qualifications using samples spiked with mycoplasma gDNA have been previously reviewed and accepted by Health Canada [8,27]. Additionally, as the authors wanted to leverage and compare our qualification of the realtime PCR method with our previous qualification of an endpoint PCR kit for the same MSC(M) investigational cell product [8], the authors wanted to stay with the same approach of using gDNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This qualification study was done specifically for MSCs(M), the same investigational cell product that was used in the authors' previous Health Canada-approved endpoint PCR kit qualification [8] to leverage the qualification data and strategy for regulatory approval. Recent studies have also reported NAT method qualification for mycoplasma detection in other therapeutic cell products, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells [27] and EpsteinÀBarr virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of another cell line is possible but needs adjustments and further troubleshooting for culture conditions and tumor induction in mice. Note: Cells should be authenticated using short tandem repeat profiling and tested for mycoplasma before experiments ( Dreolini et al., 2020 ). …”
Section: Before You Beginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note: Cells should be authenticated using short tandem repeat profiling and tested for mycoplasma before experiments ( Dreolini et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Before You Beginmentioning
confidence: 99%