2013
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1499-2013-264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid cooperation-differentiated medium access control protocol with packet piggyback for multihop wireless networks

Abstract: To improve the efficiency of node cooperation and multiple access performance in multihop wireless networks, a rapid cooperation-differentiated medium access control (MAC) protocol is proposed. In the protocol, the helper selection process is divided into a priority differentiation phase and contention resolution phase for helpers with the same priority. A higher priority helper can choose an earlier minislot in the priority differentiation phase to send a busy tone. As a result, the protocol promptly selects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drawback of using the best cooperative node table is that constructing the table consumes the extra computing and storage resources, and the information of the best cooperative nodes is possibly out of date. In recent cooperative MAC protocols, such as 2rcMAC protocol [17], CoopMACA protocol [18], the rapid cooperation-differentiated MAC (RCD-MAC) protocol [28], the priority-differentiated cooperative MAC protocol with contention resolution (CRP-CMAC) [29] and the cooperative MAC protocol with rapid relay selection (RRS-CMAC) [30], each potential cooperative node contends to participate in the cooperative transmission based on the instantaneous channel information. The better the channel quality is, the more possible it becomes the final cooperative node.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The drawback of using the best cooperative node table is that constructing the table consumes the extra computing and storage resources, and the information of the best cooperative nodes is possibly out of date. In recent cooperative MAC protocols, such as 2rcMAC protocol [17], CoopMACA protocol [18], the rapid cooperation-differentiated MAC (RCD-MAC) protocol [28], the priority-differentiated cooperative MAC protocol with contention resolution (CRP-CMAC) [29] and the cooperative MAC protocol with rapid relay selection (RRS-CMAC) [30], each potential cooperative node contends to participate in the cooperative transmission based on the instantaneous channel information. The better the channel quality is, the more possible it becomes the final cooperative node.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is easy to operate and the information of the best cooperative node is not out-of-date. To avoid the packet collisions in the process of cooperative node contention and improve the MAC performance of cooperative transmissions, collision resolution schemes [28,29,30] are used in this method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EMR selects the highest effective throughput as a metric and the winning relay is selected through a priority-based contention between relay candidates. The other protocols fitting this category can improve the performance of an IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol with some special techniques and features, such as frame aggregation in CoopMACA [11] and RRS-CMAC [12], concurrent transmissions in CCMAC [13], network coding in CODE [14] and EAP-CMAC [15], a cross-layer approach in MACR-CCT [16], interference reduction in CLS-MAC [17] and contention-based relay selection in RCD-MAC [18] and CRP-CMAC [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%