Impacts• The mass vaccination of dogs against rabies is the most rational strategy for interrupting the natural transmission of rabies. Knowledge of the virusneutralizing antibody (VNA) level against the rabies virus (RABV) is required to evaluate herd immunity of dogs in mass vaccination campaigns.• The rapid rabies antibody test (RAPINA) is a novel, immunochromatographic test that uses inactivated virus to estimate the VNA level qualitatively and is a simple, rapid and inexpensive test. We report a comparative study of the RAPINA and the virus-neutralizing test (RFFIT) for the estimation of antirabies-neutralizing antibody level in dog sample.• Comparing the performance of the two tests for evaluating the vaccination status of dogs in the Philippines, Thailand and Japan, the positive and negative predictive values and concordance of the RAPINA were highly homologous and reproducible among different laboratories. The RAPINA is appropriate to survey vaccination coverage in countries with limited resources.
SummaryThe mass vaccination of dogs against rabies is a highly rational strategy for interrupting the natural transmission of urban rabies. According to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and the World Health Organization (WHO), the immunization of at least 70% of the total dog population minimizes the risk of endemic rabies. Knowledge of the virus-neutralizing antibody (VNA) level against the rabies virus (RABV) is required to evaluate protective immunity and vaccine coverage of dogs in the field. The rapid focus fluorescent inhibition test (RFFIT) and the fluorescent antibody virus neutralization (FAVN) test are recommended by OIE and WHO to determine the VNA levels in serum. However, these tests are cell culture based and require the use of live viruses and specialized equipment. The rapid neutralizing antibody test (RAPINA) is a novel, immunochromatographic test that uses inactivated virus to estimate the VNA level qualitatively. It is a simple, rapid and inexpensive, although indirect, assay for the detection of VNA levels. The RAPINA has shown good positive and negative predictive values and a high concordance with the RFFIT results. In this study, we compared the performance of the two tests for evaluating the vaccination status of dogs in the Philippines, Thailand and Japan. A total of 1135 dog
355This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.Zoonoses and Public Health sera were analysed by the RAPINA and compared to the VNA levels determined by the RFFIT. The overall positive and negative predictive values of the RAPINA were 96.2-99.3% and 84.5-94.8%, respectively, with a concordance (kappa) of 0.946-0.97 among the three countries. The RAPINA results were highly homologous and reproducible among different laboratories. These results suggest that this test ...