Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose of review The past two decades have witnessed an impressive expansion in the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma, leading to significant improvements in progression-free; as well as overall survival. However, almost all patients still experience multiple relapses during their disease course, with biological and cytogenetic heterogeneity affecting response to subsequent treatments. The purpose of this review is to provide a historical background regarding the role of alkylating agents and an updated data regarding the use of peptide–drug conjugates such as melflufen for patients with multiple myeloma. Recent findings The combination of daratumumab–melflufen–dexamethasone evaluated in the LIGHTHOUSE study showed a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to single-agent daratumumab (not reached vs. 4.9 months respectively; P = 0.0032), with improvement in overall response rate to 59% vs. 30% respectively; P = 0.03. Summary There have been an interest in developing and utilizing peptide–drug conjugates such as melflufen for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, especially in the relapsed setting given historical results with alkylating agents, the use of which has been limited by dose-related toxicities in a disease that remains largely incurable. Single agent melflufen initially showed promising results especially in specific subgroups of heavily pretreated patients before the decision to suspend all clinical trials evaluating this agent after results from the OCEAN phase 3 trial. Subsequent reported analyses especially for melflufen-based combinations appear promising and suggest a potential use of peptide–drug conjugates provided optimal patient selection, as well as identification of the best companion agent.
Purpose of review The past two decades have witnessed an impressive expansion in the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma, leading to significant improvements in progression-free; as well as overall survival. However, almost all patients still experience multiple relapses during their disease course, with biological and cytogenetic heterogeneity affecting response to subsequent treatments. The purpose of this review is to provide a historical background regarding the role of alkylating agents and an updated data regarding the use of peptide–drug conjugates such as melflufen for patients with multiple myeloma. Recent findings The combination of daratumumab–melflufen–dexamethasone evaluated in the LIGHTHOUSE study showed a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to single-agent daratumumab (not reached vs. 4.9 months respectively; P = 0.0032), with improvement in overall response rate to 59% vs. 30% respectively; P = 0.03. Summary There have been an interest in developing and utilizing peptide–drug conjugates such as melflufen for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, especially in the relapsed setting given historical results with alkylating agents, the use of which has been limited by dose-related toxicities in a disease that remains largely incurable. Single agent melflufen initially showed promising results especially in specific subgroups of heavily pretreated patients before the decision to suspend all clinical trials evaluating this agent after results from the OCEAN phase 3 trial. Subsequent reported analyses especially for melflufen-based combinations appear promising and suggest a potential use of peptide–drug conjugates provided optimal patient selection, as well as identification of the best companion agent.
Background Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and high-risk genetic abnormalities such as del(17p) and TP53 mutation have poor response to standard therapies and shorter survival compared to patients without these aberrations. Here, we investigated the activity and mechanism of action of peptide-drug conjugate melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) in TP53 wild type (TP53wt) and mutant (TP53mut) myeloma models and assessed the efficacy of melflufen in patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation. Methods We evaluated melflufen activity ex vivo in 24 myeloma bone marrow (BM) samples and explored indicators of response from single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) profiles. The efficacy of melflufen vs. control treatments was further investigated in TP53-/- and parental TP53wt myeloma cell lines. DNA damage, apoptosis kinetics, mitochondrial function, plus transcriptomic and metabolic data were analyzed to understand the mechanisms responsible for melflufen activity in the absence of p53. Patient outcome data from the OCEAN phase III clinical trial (NCT03151811), which investigated the clinical activity of melflufen in RRMM, were statistically analyzed to assess the impact of del(17p) and TP53 mutation on clinical response. Results BM plasma cell (PC) response to melflufen was independent of TP53 mutation status, with melflufen active in del(17p), TP53mut, and TP53wt samples. Differential analysis of scRNAseq data demonstrated that melflufen sensitive PCs had lower expression of p53 target genes and higher expression of genes associated with DNA damage repair and cell cycle checkpoints. Analysis of TP53-/- and TP53wt cell lines showed superior efficacy of melflufen in comparison to melphalan or cyclophosphamide. In the presence and absence of functional p53, melflufen robustly induced apoptosis, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction. In TP53-/- cells, melflufen treatment led to distinct changes in expression of genes associated with cell cycle checkpoint and apoptosis, which were not observed with melphalan treatment. Notably, post-hoc analysis of the OCEAN trial del(17p) patient population demonstrated favorable progression free survival in the del(17p) subgroup treated with melflufen plus dexamethasone compared to the pomalidomide plus dexamethasone arm. Conclusions Our insights into the molecular mechanisms of melflufen activity in TP53mut myeloma support its clinical efficacy and application in the del(17p) and TP53mut patient population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.