2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid phenol toxicity test based on photosynthesis and movement of the freshwater flagellate, Euglena agilis Carter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in biomass can be attributed to the presence of phenol in water since its toxic nature can drastically affect the plant health parameters such evapotranspiration, photosynthesis rate, etc. (Kottuparambil et al, 2014, Ucisik and Trapp, 2006). It has been reported that, in willow plants, 50% of the evapotranspiration was dropped after its exposure to water containing phenol 500 mg l −1 whereas complete plant death occurred at 1000 mg l −1 of phenol exposure (Ucisik and Trapp, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduction in biomass can be attributed to the presence of phenol in water since its toxic nature can drastically affect the plant health parameters such evapotranspiration, photosynthesis rate, etc. (Kottuparambil et al, 2014, Ucisik and Trapp, 2006). It has been reported that, in willow plants, 50% of the evapotranspiration was dropped after its exposure to water containing phenol 500 mg l −1 whereas complete plant death occurred at 1000 mg l −1 of phenol exposure (Ucisik and Trapp, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the pollutants are, however, toxic enough to downgrade the overall cleaning process by reducing the plant growth and inhibiting bacterial degradation (Alkio et al, 2005). Phenol is among these pollutants, and can affect both of the processes due to its bactericidal properties and plant metabolic malfunctioning potential (Adeboye et al, 2014, Kottuparambil et al, 2014, Phenrat et al, 2017, Ucisik and Trapp, 2006). To overcome such a situation, artificial augmentation of rhizobacteria and/or endophytic bacteria, having antagonistic activities for the specific pollution type, have been proposed in a variety of phytoremediation experiments (Afzal et al, 2014, Khan et al, 2013, Weyens et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of rhizospheric strains to survive and effectively utilize toxic pollutants is a prerequisite for their use in phytoremediation [10]. Many organic pollutants negatively affect the phytoremediation process, inhibiting plant growth due to metabolic disorders and a decrease in bacterial degradation as a result of bactericidal exposure [11][12][13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the earliest examples was the use of fi sh which were deployed in potentially polluted water; when they died or showed abnormal swimming behavior this was interpreted as an indication of the presence of lethal or sublethal concentrations of toxic substances in the water [21]. Later on, many other organisms have been utilized in bioassays including bacteria, microorganisms, lower and higher plants as well as invertebrates and vertebrates [22][23][24][25]. Different endpoints can be used as indicators for toxicity including mortality, motility and behavior, growth and reproduction as well as physiological parameters such as photosynthesis, protein biosynthsis and genetic alteration of aquatic organisms [26].…”
Section: After Reaction With Oxygen and Heavy Metals Such As Ironmentioning
confidence: 99%