2020
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid rice blast detection and identification method based on crop disease spores' diffraction fingerprint texture

Abstract: BACKGROUND Rice blast fungus is a worldwide disease, and it is one of the most serious rice diseases in the north and south rice fields in China. The initial symptoms of rice blast are not obvious, and the speed of transmission is fast. Manual identification is time‐consuming and laborious. At present, it is a great challenge to realize rapid and accurate early identification of rice blast. RESULTS In this paper, an identification method based on crop disease spores' diffraction fingerprint texture for rice bl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike deep learning-based spore detection algorithms, the main focus of traditional machine learning algorithms was to detect a single spore class, which had relatively lower detection difficulty [5,6]. Although the lowest detection rate among the three previous studies reached 0.940 [28][29][30], there were many problems, such as the models could not be applied to detect mixed spore images directly and had much lower detection efficiency (Table 4). Therefore, according to the results of this study, for the task of monitoring conidia inoculum of rice blast fungus in the field, the deep object detection algorithms are more applicable and effective.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike deep learning-based spore detection algorithms, the main focus of traditional machine learning algorithms was to detect a single spore class, which had relatively lower detection difficulty [5,6]. Although the lowest detection rate among the three previous studies reached 0.940 [28][29][30], there were many problems, such as the models could not be applied to detect mixed spore images directly and had much lower detection efficiency (Table 4). Therefore, according to the results of this study, for the task of monitoring conidia inoculum of rice blast fungus in the field, the deep object detection algorithms are more applicable and effective.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Yang et al [28] detected the spores of rice false smut and rice blast pathogens separately by using the decision tree and the confusion matrix based on features of texture and shape. Wang et al [29] extracted the HOG features based on the shape of rice blast spores, after which an intersection kernel support vector machine classifier was used to detect rice blast spores. Qi et al [30] obtained the binary image of the rice blast pathogen spores firstly, and then adopted the improved watershed algorithm to separate the adhesive spores and count them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the color, shape, and texture characteristics of spores were extracted, and the classification models of the spores were built based on logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM), respectively. Yang et al [ 21 ] in order to achieve early detection of rice blast proposed a method to detect and identify rice blast based on crop disease spores’ diffraction fingerprint texture, which has certain advantages compared with the existing method of manual identification by microscope. Although the above methods can achieve early detection of crop airborne diseases, they still face many problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rice samples quality is analyzed using Visible Near InfraRed (VNIR) hyperspectral imaging technology in [6]. Firstly, they cleaned the image samples from the scatter effect phenomena by carrying out five methods: SG1, SG2, MSC, SNV, and PMSC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%