2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rapid Seismic Risk Assessment Method for Existing Building Stock in Urban Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…또한 취약한 건물을 식별하거나(예. Albayrak et al, 2015;Vona et al, 2018;Özbay et al, 2020) 가치비용과 중요도를 고려(예. Talebiyan and Mahsuli, 2018;Nanda et al, 2019;D'Alpaos and Valluzzi, 2020;Tung et al, 2020)…”
Section: 기타의견unclassified
“…또한 취약한 건물을 식별하거나(예. Albayrak et al, 2015;Vona et al, 2018;Özbay et al, 2020) 가치비용과 중요도를 고려(예. Talebiyan and Mahsuli, 2018;Nanda et al, 2019;D'Alpaos and Valluzzi, 2020;Tung et al, 2020)…”
Section: 기타의견unclassified
“…One of the frequently used methods is developed by FEMA-P 154, namely the rapid visual screening of buildings which is based on the visual observation mainly on buildings' exterior elements [14]. Similar seismic risk evaluation on the built structures was conducted by Albayrak et al in 2015, where a large scale in-situ investigation of more than a thousand buildings was undertaken. Their method was a rapid street screening for potential seismic hazards to detect, create an inventory, and rank the most vulnerable buildings in a forthcoming earthquake [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical damage of earthquakes to structures causes minor effects, for example, power, water, or gas outages. Most times, the secondary impact causes more socioeconomic losses than losses from straight structural damage [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%