2014
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid, sensitive and solvent‐less method for determination of malonaldehyde in meat by stir bar sorptive extraction coupled thermal desorption and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with in situ derivatization

Abstract: The SBSE-TD-GC/MS method was suitable to monitor and analyze MDA in meat samples at trace levels. The simple, sensitive and solvent-less method with moderated in situ derivatization can be applied for analysis of MDA in a wide variety of foods and biological samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples prepared in the above procedures were detected in the following two methods in the same manner: In the CLEIA method, 1 mL of the supernatant was blown to dryness at 30°C under nitrogen, and the residue was dissolved in 5 mL 6.4% DMF-competitive reaction buffer solution (sample diluted to a concentration in the CLEIA detection linear range), and the dissolved solution was measured by CLEIA. In the GC-MS method[ 25 26 ] 4 mL supernatant was blown to dryness at 30°C under nitrogen, and the residue was dissolved in 4 mL of n-hexane, and the solution was filtered through 0.22 μm organic phase membrane for GC-MS analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples prepared in the above procedures were detected in the following two methods in the same manner: In the CLEIA method, 1 mL of the supernatant was blown to dryness at 30°C under nitrogen, and the residue was dissolved in 5 mL 6.4% DMF-competitive reaction buffer solution (sample diluted to a concentration in the CLEIA detection linear range), and the dissolved solution was measured by CLEIA. In the GC-MS method[ 25 26 ] 4 mL supernatant was blown to dryness at 30°C under nitrogen, and the residue was dissolved in 4 mL of n-hexane, and the solution was filtered through 0.22 μm organic phase membrane for GC-MS analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SBSE and direct immersion-SPME (DI-SPME) have the same extraction principle, but it has higher analytical sensitivity (>100 times) due to the increase in extraction phase volume. Weak polarity polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), currently the only commercialized SBSE, is more suitable for extracting derivatives than MDA or HNE (Ruan, Aalhus, & Juárez, 2014;Stopforth, Burger, Crouch, & Sandra, 2006). LPME can avoid the problems of poor repeatability between SPME fibers and fiber wear but requires precise manual operation (Fiamegos & Stalikas, 2008;Mirmoghaddam, Kaykhaii, & Hashemi, 2016).…”
Section: Other Microextraction Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the thick coating of sorptive media on the stir bar allows a larger phase volume to be realized (tens of microliters) compared to the SPME approach . Since the advent of this technique in the late 90s, numerous groups have employed this solventless extraction technique to detect the aromatic volatile compounds, for instance, those present in plants , beverages , and animal products with far better sensitivity and repeatability than traditional techniques. The large phase volume of these stir bars (32 μL of stir bar sorptive extraction sorptive phase as opposed to 0.6 μL in a traditional SPME fibres) further helps in absorbing a wider spectrum of organic compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%