2014 25nd IEEE International Symposium on Rapid System Prototyping 2014
DOI: 10.1109/rsp.2014.6966903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rapid Testing Framework for a Mobile Cloud

Abstract: Mobile clouds such as network-connected vehicles and satellite clusters are an emerging class of systems that are extensions to traditional real-time embedded systems: they provide long-term mission platforms made up of dynamic clusters of heterogeneous hardware nodes communicating over ad hoc wireless networks. Besides the inherent complexities entailed by a distributed architecture, developing software and testing these systems is difficult due to a number of other reasons, including the mobile nature of suc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet unlike MockFog, these testbeds can only simulate realistic network conditions, not the constrained compute capabilities of fog nodes, especially at the edge. Balasubramanian et al 74 present a testbed for fog applications that facilitates emulating these constraints but requires physical hardware for each node rather than cheaper virtual machines.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet unlike MockFog, these testbeds can only simulate realistic network conditions, not the constrained compute capabilities of fog nodes, especially at the edge. Balasubramanian et al 74 present a testbed for fog applications that facilitates emulating these constraints but requires physical hardware for each node rather than cheaper virtual machines.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, this challenge has been a key research topic in the last few years. On the one hand, there are static solutions using upfront best practices [103,52,71,112], simulation [60,59,51,67,23,116,129,107,39,115,46], testbed evaluation [55,84,32,37,84,32,10,35,7,78], a combination of those [105,110], or formalized assignment problems [34,24,25,92,47,5,61,72,126,134,65]. On the other hand, dynamic approaches using centralized schedulers [14,121,81,36,6,91,87,135,98,88,…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet unlike MockFog, these testbeds can only simulate realistic network conditions, not the constrained compute capabilities of fog nodes, especially at the edge. Balasubramanian et al [53] present a testbed for fog applications that facilitates emulating these constraints, yet requires physical hardware for each node rather than cheaper virtual machines.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%