2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid urban site index for assessing the quality of street tree planting sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…INFR (distance to infrastructure) showed up in three models and had a positive association with health, corroborating past findings by Koeser et al, [19], where expanding widths from sidewalk to curb improved tree condition, and research by Sanders and Grabosky [81], where tree growth increased in wider parking lot cut-outs. In contrast, ERA (estimated rooting area) yielded mixed results in our health analysis, after being the most strongly correlated-to-tree health variable in the RUSI model [72]. One possible explanation is that trees in this study are still in the younger stages of their life cycle, and rooting area may be less limiting at their current size [4].…”
Section: Tree Healthmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…INFR (distance to infrastructure) showed up in three models and had a positive association with health, corroborating past findings by Koeser et al, [19], where expanding widths from sidewalk to curb improved tree condition, and research by Sanders and Grabosky [81], where tree growth increased in wider parking lot cut-outs. In contrast, ERA (estimated rooting area) yielded mixed results in our health analysis, after being the most strongly correlated-to-tree health variable in the RUSI model [72]. One possible explanation is that trees in this study are still in the younger stages of their life cycle, and rooting area may be less limiting at their current size [4].…”
Section: Tree Healthmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Health was rated using the method outlined by Bond [71] -classifying growth, opacity, ratio, quality, and vitality into 20% scoring classes. Among the site-related predictor variables assessed in this study were those detailed by Scharenbroch et al, [72] in their creation of the Rapid Urban Site Index (RUSI). The index was modified for this study, though the following factors were replicated exactly as detailed: distance to infrastructure (INFR), estimated rooting area (ERA), soil texture (TXT), soil structure (STRC), surface (SURF), wet aggregate stability (WAS), crown light exposure (EXP), A-horizon depth (AHOR), and electrical conductivity (EC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Entretanto, o estresse ambiental e as práticas de manejo inadequadas, como a poda drástica, predispõem a árvore ao ataque de pragas e doenças, o que acaba por causar o declínio da condição geral, do seu equilíbrio, da apresentação estética e de sua longevidade (HARRIS;CLARK. MATHENY, 1999;SCHARENBROCH et al, 2017), e por consequência podem afetar a quantidade e qualidade de determinados benefícios (KOESER et al, 2013).…”
unclassified
“…Diferentes estudos têm utilizado a avaliação da qualidade das árvores urbanas para expressar o desempenho delas diante das adversidades de crescimento nas cidades (KOESER et al, 2013;NORTH et al, 2017;SCHARENBROCH et al, 2017), por outro lado não existem estudos que correlacionem diretamente a condição geral das árvores com a qualidade e quantidade de benefícios ofertados.…”
unclassified