“…Though, this type of miscalibration does not extend to all domains, these effects are typically pervasive (Jansen et al, 2017;Nelson et al, 1991;Tyszka & Zielonka, 2002;Zell et al, 2020). Additionally, though this pattern of results (often referred to as the Dunning-Kruger effect) is one of the more highly replicable and robust effects in psychology (Jansen et al, 2021;Zell et al, 2020), it is not without its critics. Indeed, there has been some debate as to whether these patterns of results reflect individual differences in metacognition (e.g., Dunning et al, 2003;Kruger & Dunning, 1999;McIntosh et al, 2019), differing memory processes (Muller et al, 2021), the "better-than-average" heuristic (Krueger & Mueller, 2002), or biases motivated toward self-enhancement (e.g., Anderson et al, 2012;Roy & Leirsch, 2013;Pronin et al, 2002).…”