2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2003.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A re-analysis of the atmospheric and ionospheric effects of the Flixborough explosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This appears to be typical of the third world. This situation is quite different from the one existing in developed countries where dust explosions are recognized as very major industrial hazards that can match or exceed the ferocity of well-known industrial disasters like the one that occurred in Flixborough [38], and meticulous attention is paid towards their analysis, prevention, and control. …”
Section: Illustrative Case Histories Of a Few Major Dust Explosionsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This appears to be typical of the third world. This situation is quite different from the one existing in developed countries where dust explosions are recognized as very major industrial hazards that can match or exceed the ferocity of well-known industrial disasters like the one that occurred in Flixborough [38], and meticulous attention is paid towards their analysis, prevention, and control. …”
Section: Illustrative Case Histories Of a Few Major Dust Explosionsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The aim of contemporary research activity is basically twofold: (i) contribution to remote detection of underground nuclear explosions, and (ii) search for the energy deposition by infrasound and its impact on processes in the upper atmosphere and ionosphere. More detailed information about explosion-oriented research may be found in Krasnov et al (2003) or Krasnov and Drobzheva (2005). A review paper for Surveys in Geophysics is under preparation.…”
Section: Infrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this reason the acoustic calculations based on the real temperature profile of the atmosphere may give results that are different from the results obtained by Warshaw and Dubois (1981). Drobzheva and Krasnov have tested their model simultaneously at all eight measurement locations over the height range from about 10 to 260 km Krasnov et al, 2003). The correlation coefficient between the calculated and experimental forms of the Doppler response was in the range from 0.85 to 0.989.…”
Section: Theoretical Problemsmentioning
confidence: 85%