2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A re-evaluation of dilution for eliminating PCR inhibition in soil DNA samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard curves for fungal and bacterial nirK genes were prepared using a 10-fold dilution series of a plasmid containing target gene fragments. To remove the contamination of humid acid in soil DNA, the qPCR data were corrected following the methodology of Wang et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard curves for fungal and bacterial nirK genes were prepared using a 10-fold dilution series of a plasmid containing target gene fragments. To remove the contamination of humid acid in soil DNA, the qPCR data were corrected following the methodology of Wang et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic DNA was extracted from bulk and rhizosphere soils that had been previously stored at −80 C, using a PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories). We pooled three successive extracts per sample in order to maximize DNA yields and reduce bias due to incomplete cell lysis during DNA extraction (H. Wang, Qi, Xiao, Wang, & Tian, 2017). After quality inspection, a total of 120 DNA samples (6 or 12 replicates of each soil type × 3 soil types × 2 compartments × 2 treatments) were obtained.…”
Section: Bacterial Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA extraction efficiency and potential PCR reaction inhibition was taken into consideration by applying the proper dilution step for achieving accurate quantification (H. Wang, Qi, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Bacterial Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EM6 and EM7 did not include a step of phase separation using phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and therefore had a higher chance to be ineffective at separating DNA from polysaccharides (Zhang et al, 2006), which are likely to act as PCR inhibitors (Monteiro et al, 1997;Schrader et al, 2012). A moderate level of dilution is often recommended to diminish the effect and concentration of PCR inhibitors from environmental samples (Wang et al, 2017), so we hypothesized that a second elution could improve genotyping success. Consequently, for EM6 and EM7 we tested two elutions.…”
Section: Extraction Methods 5 (Em5)mentioning
confidence: 99%