1951
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.81.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Re-Evaluation of the Fundamental Atomic Constants

Abstract: A completely new evaluation of the fundamental atomic constants by the method of least squares is presented. A number of new and highly precise experiments have been taken into account, including the measurement of: (1) the velocity of light by an exceptionally ingenious and precise method due to Hansen and Bol, (2) the absolute proton moment, (3) the ratio of magnetic moments of proton and electron, (4) the proton moment in Bohr magnetons, (5) the hyperfine structure separation of ground-state hydrogen, (6) t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier work [2][3][4][5][6] often used a least-squares analysis (LSA) to provide self-consistent values for a set or subset of fundamental constants. The TGFC continues this approach but it has been extended to include virtually all of the essential fundamental constants and to account for the functional and experimental correlations.…”
Section: The Methodology Of Recommending a Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier work [2][3][4][5][6] often used a least-squares analysis (LSA) to provide self-consistent values for a set or subset of fundamental constants. The TGFC continues this approach but it has been extended to include virtually all of the essential fundamental constants and to account for the functional and experimental correlations.…”
Section: The Methodology Of Recommending a Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally agreed that Birge [1] was the first to attempt an adjustment of the values of the fundamental constants (and it seems most appropriate that this reference is the first page of the first volume of Review of Modern Physics). In the intervening time, others have made similar adjustments [2][3][4][5][6], but it eventually became apparent that a single source of these adjustments with broad international acceptance would provide the most benefits. This is why the CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants (TGFC) came into being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57,58 During this time period, Bearden and coworkers also contributed to the work of this NRC subcommittee and published a series of papers making recommendations for some of the fundamental constants and providing some discussion about inconsistencies, uncertainties, and evaluation methods. [59][60][61][62][63][64] A summary report by the NRC committee was published in 1952. 65 In 1966, the CODATA was established by the International Council of Science, and in 1969, the CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants was formed.…”
Section: History Of Evaluations Of the Fundamental Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantity having general practical significance is the y-ray dose-rate in roentgens per hour in air at 1 em from 1 millicurie of a radioactive isotope which for convenience, is referred to in what follows as the K factor. The experimental evaluation of the K factor for a particular radioactive isotope involves the determination of two quantities namely the disintegration rate of a sample of the isotope and the y-ray dose-rate at 1 ) have participated in a programme of inter-comparisons of different methods of measuring absolute disintegration rates by counting methods. The programme (9) has also in-eluded measurements of y-ray dose-rates, primarily with the object of deriving disintegration rates by using the theoretical K factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%