2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2020.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Real-Time Capable Linear Time Classifier Scheme for Anticipated Hand Movements Recognition from Amputee Subjects Using Surface EMG Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of the NinaPro database presented a performance baseline for 50 hand movements in 11 amputees [8,27], where the average accuracy with a CNN model was below 40% and was 42.67% with a SVM classifier. Arunraj et al [39] also computed the average performance with 53.3% for 50 movements in 11 amputees. They selected the Logarithmic Variance (LV), Auto-Regressive Co-efficient (ARC), WL and MAV with the Random Fourier Mapping (RFM) method to classify hand movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of the NinaPro database presented a performance baseline for 50 hand movements in 11 amputees [8,27], where the average accuracy with a CNN model was below 40% and was 42.67% with a SVM classifier. Arunraj et al [39] also computed the average performance with 53.3% for 50 movements in 11 amputees. They selected the Logarithmic Variance (LV), Auto-Regressive Co-efficient (ARC), WL and MAV with the Random Fourier Mapping (RFM) method to classify hand movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, features were extracted using feature extraction methods (i.e., FS1, FS2, FS3, and FS4) that created a high-dimensional feature space, as mentioned in Section 2.2.2. e feature dimensionality was reduced (total classes − 1 � 10 − 1 � 9) using ULDA [73]. Now, the 9-dimensional reduced feature vectors for each feature extraction method were classified using three popular classifiers: LDA with quadratic function [74,75], SVM with Gaussian radian basis kernel function (sigma value � 1) [76], and KNN with cityblock distance (neighbours � 3) [37]. In this performance evaluation, five trials containing 1000 samples (trials × movements × samples per trial � 5 × 10 × 20) were used as training data, and the remaining trial containing 200 samples (trials × movements × samples per trial � 1 × 10 × 20) was used as testing data.…”
Section: Emg Pattern Recognition Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, the raw EEG signal was passed through a preprocessing step for feature extraction. Several feature selection methods have been proposed in the literature; wavelet transforms, eigenvectors, time-frequency distributions, autoregressive models to name a few [12]- [14]. In this research, the two methods of feature extraction are investigated, one involving the raw EEG data and the other involving Fourier transformed EEG data.…”
Section: Motion Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%