2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-12002-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A real-time monitoring system for automatic morphology analysis of yeast cultivation in a jar fermenter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An application of ISM based on an image analysis algorithm that uses detection of regional maxima can be used to determine the average size of single cells enabling on-line size monitoring [6]. With the progress in image processing technology, it turns out to be easier to extract information on several parameters, enabling the use of this technology for the measurement of microbial morphology, in fact image analysis and automated methods can be used to provide a better and detailed understanding of the morphology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells; in this context are well suited image-processing techniques to monitor yeasts cultivation directly using high-speed cameras [7], [8] and machine learning approaches [9] using classical segmentation algorithms [10], [11] and ones based on a set of relevant individual cell features based on first and second order histograms and waveletbased texture measurement extracted from the microscope images of the yeast cells to represent the morphological characteristics in a more sophisticated way [12]. Counting procedures can be computed using the traditional microscopy or more effectively resorting to automatic systems as the image processing techniques and the segmentation algorithms cited before or bright-field microscopy and dye-exclusion methods [13].…”
Section: Related Results In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An application of ISM based on an image analysis algorithm that uses detection of regional maxima can be used to determine the average size of single cells enabling on-line size monitoring [6]. With the progress in image processing technology, it turns out to be easier to extract information on several parameters, enabling the use of this technology for the measurement of microbial morphology, in fact image analysis and automated methods can be used to provide a better and detailed understanding of the morphology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells; in this context are well suited image-processing techniques to monitor yeasts cultivation directly using high-speed cameras [7], [8] and machine learning approaches [9] using classical segmentation algorithms [10], [11] and ones based on a set of relevant individual cell features based on first and second order histograms and waveletbased texture measurement extracted from the microscope images of the yeast cells to represent the morphological characteristics in a more sophisticated way [12]. Counting procedures can be computed using the traditional microscopy or more effectively resorting to automatic systems as the image processing techniques and the segmentation algorithms cited before or bright-field microscopy and dye-exclusion methods [13].…”
Section: Related Results In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S11 A and B ). As a comparison, we also classified these cells into three clusters based on their morphological and dynamical features ( Datasets S7–S9 ), which were extracted from the cell images by three representative and well-used conventional image analysis software programs ( 17 ): NIS-Elements ( 18 ), CellProfiler 4 ( 17 ), and TrackMate 7 ( 19 ) in Fiji (ImageJ) ( 20 ) ( SI Appendix , Fig. S12 A , C , and E and Text 7 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%