2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-009-0752-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A realtime observatory for laboratory simulation of planetary flows

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not possible to compare our results directly with the analyses produced by Ravela et al (2010), because they only compared their analyses with the observations used for assimilation (in-sample error) rather than independent observations (out-of-sample error) † . A comparison of the in-sample error is possible, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is not possible to compare our results directly with the analyses produced by Ravela et al (2010), because they only compared their analyses with the observations used for assimilation (in-sample error) rather than independent observations (out-of-sample error) † . A comparison of the in-sample error is possible, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It might be fruitful to study this in the annulus, where specific sources of model error might be more easily identified than in atmospheric models. Ravela et al (2010) use the EnKF in their annulus assimilation work, so their method might be a good place to start.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(16). Another approach of using image observation in laboratory data assimilation can be found in Ravela et al (2010). The authors used a computer vision system to extract measurements from the physical simulation with parallel computing and decomposition to account for observation in real time as well as using the numerical model to adapt the observing system.…”
Section: Observation Operators For Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%