2007
DOI: 10.1109/tsmcb.2006.886166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Recurrent Neural Network for Solving a Class of General Variational Inequalities

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents a recurrent neural-network model for solving a special class of general variational inequalities (GVIs), which includes classical VIs as special cases. It is proved that the proposed neural network (NN) for solving this class of GVIs can be globally convergent, globally asymptotically stable, and globally exponentially stable under different conditions. The proposed NN can be viewed as a modified version of the general projection NN existing in the literature. Several numerical exa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, the -WTA network (21) as well as network (18) do not need to choose any parameter (the scaling factor can be any positive number), which can be deemed as a great advantage over networks (15) and (16). In addition, the two networks (18) and (21) allow for some equal input signals [see (17)], a situation often encountered in practice but excluded by (15) and (16).…”
Section: Model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretically, the -WTA network (21) as well as network (18) do not need to choose any parameter (the scaling factor can be any positive number), which can be deemed as a great advantage over networks (15) and (16). In addition, the two networks (18) and (21) allow for some equal input signals [see (17)], a situation often encountered in practice but excluded by (15) and (16).…”
Section: Model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the two networks (18) and (21) allow for some equal input signals [see (17)], a situation often encountered in practice but excluded by (15) and (16). These facts have been indicated in the last two rows of Table II for a clear comparison.…”
Section: Model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations