“…By far, a range of wide bandgap semiconductors, specifically those complaining with cost-effectiveness and low toxicity criteria, have been tested for the SERS metrology. ,,− Particularly, metal-oxide semiconductors, e.g., ZnO and TiO 2 , were employed as efficient SERS substrates. These materials are also effective photocatalysts, and because of their self-cleaning properties, these oxides were suggested to be promising recyclable SERS substrates. − Notably, ZnO exhibits a higher refractive index and stronger optical absorption, making it more efficient for SERS applications. − Additionally, its surface has more electrochemically active sites than that of TiO 2 , which improves SERS signals and photocatalytic activity on its surface due to the charge transfer mechanism. ,, In its turn, noble metal nanostructures, including Ag, Au, etc., have been used extensively as SERS substrates too, due to their excellent LSPR properties, featuring intense absorption and “hot spots”, resulting in an enhanced local electromagnetic field providing conditions for ultrasensitive SERS detection. , Thus, the current state of the art is in designing heterogeneous composites combining the unique LSPR characteristics of the noble metals with the self-cleaning capabilities of the metal oxide nanostructures in order to produce highly sensitive and recyclable SERS substrates with tunable characteristics for long-term practical applications. ,,,,, …”